Literature DB >> 19563466

Efficacy of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment as second-line treatment for children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: evidence from a randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial vs. fluticasone 0.005% ointment.

N Doss1, M-R Kamoun, L Dubertret, F Cambazard, A Remitz, M Lahfa, Y de Prost.   

Abstract

Tacrolimus 0.03% ointment is licensed for second-line treatment of children with atopic dermatitis (AD). Although data are available from clinical trials, no study has enrolled only second-line patients. This double-blind, non-inferiority study compared tacrolimus 0.03% and fluticasone 0.005% ointments in children with moderate-to-severe AD, who had responded insufficiently to conventional therapies. Children (aged 2-15 yr) were randomized to tacrolimus ointment (n = 240) or fluticasone ointment (n = 239), twice daily until clearance or for a maximum of 3 wk and, if lesions remained, once daily for up to 3 wk further. Primary end-point was week 3 response rate (improvement of >or=60% in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index and not withdrawn for lack of efficacy). Secondary end-points included pruritus and sleep quality, global assessment of clinical response, incidence of new flares and safety. Response rates were 86.3% with tacrolimus ointment and 91.5% with fluticasone. Lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was -11.8%, exceeding the non-inferiority limit of -15% and meeting the primary end-point. Moderate or better improvement on the physicians' global assessment occurred in 93.6% and 92.4% of patients in the tacrolimus ointment and fluticasone arms, respectively, while median pruritus scores improved by 84.0% and 91.5%. Sleep quality improved by approximately 92% in both treatment arms. After day 21, new flare-up occurred in 5.5% and 11.3% of patients receiving tacrolimus ointment and fluticasone, respectively; mean times to new flares were 6.5 +/- 5.0 and 8.6 +/- 5.2 days. Adverse events were similar between the two arms, with the exception of application-site skin burning sensation in the tacrolimus ointment group. In conclusion, efficacy of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment as second-line treatment was not inferior to that of fluticasone 0.005% ointment, with similar benefits on global disease improvement and quality of sleep.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19563466     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2009.00895.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  6 in total

1.  An Open-Label Prospective Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Fluticasone Versus Tacrolimus in the Proactive Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Vinodhini R Mudaliyar; Asha Pathak; Alok Dixit; Sweta S Kumar
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2020-10-26

Review 2.  Topical calcineurin inhibitors and lymphoma risk: evidence update with implications for daily practice.

Authors:  Elaine C Siegfried; Jennifer C Jaworski; Adelaide A Hebert
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 3.  Sleep Disturbances and Atopic Dermatitis: Relationships, Methods for Assessment, and Therapies.

Authors:  Fatima Bawany; Carrie A Northcott; Lisa A Beck; Wilfred R Pigeon
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-12-13

Review 4.  A Systematic Scoping Literature Review of Publications Supporting Treatment Guidelines for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis in Contrast to Clinical Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Elaine C Siegfried; Jennifer C Jaworski; Paola Mina-Osorio
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2018-06-01

5.  Efficacy and safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Natalia Abędź; Rafał Pawliczak
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 6.  Safety of topical corticosteroids in atopic eczema: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Emma Axon; Joanne R Chalmers; Miriam Santer; Matthew J Ridd; Sandra Lawton; Sinead M Langan; Douglas J C Grindlay; Ingrid Muller; Amanda Roberts; Amina Ahmed; Hywel C Williams; Kim S Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.