Literature DB >> 19563256

Cost-effectiveness of ziconotide in intrathecal pain management for severe chronic pain patients in the UK.

S Dewilde1, L Verdian, G D H Maclaine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of using intrathecal ziconotide in the treatment of severe chronic pain compared to best supportive care for patients with intractable chronic pain in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: Using a simulation model, the analysis evaluated the cost and health economic consequences of using ziconotide as a treatment for severe chronic pain. The modelled population and clinical data were based on a randomised controlled trial in which the main outcome was reduction in pain as measured by the visual analogue scale of pain intensity (VASPI). Resource use data were elicited using a modified Delphi panel and costed using published sources. Utility values were derived from a separate research study. The main outcome measure was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Extensive scenario analysis was conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty.
RESULTS: Overall, findings were robust to most assumptions. The cost-effectiveness of ziconotide compared to best supportive care (BSC) was pound 27,443 per QALY (95% CI pound 18,304-38,504). Scenarios were investigated in which discount rates, the time horizon, the threshold for qualifying as a responder, pump-related assumptions, utilities, ziconotide drug dose, and the patient discontinuation rate with ziconotide were varied. The most sensitive parameter was the dosage of ziconotide: using the lower and upper bounds of the average ziconotide dosage observed in the long-term open-label study changed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to pound 15,500 [pound 8206-25,405] and pound 44,700 [pound 30,541-62, 670].
CONCLUSIONS: Ziconotide may offer an economically feasible alternative solution for patients for whom current treatment is inappropriate or ineffective. The main study limitation is that some model inputs, mainly related to resource use, are based on assumptions or expert interviews.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19563256     DOI: 10.1185/03007990903090849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  4 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal ziconotide: a review of its use in patients with chronic pain refractory to other systemic or intrathecal analgesics.

Authors:  Mark Sanford
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher J Cadham; Marie Knoll; Luz María Sánchez-Romero; K Michael Cummings; Clifford E Douglas; Alex Liber; David Mendez; Rafael Meza; Ritesh Mistry; Aylin Sertkaya; Nargiz Travis; David T Levy
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 3.  Practical considerations and patient selection for intrathecal drug delivery in the management of chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael Saulino; Philip S Kim; Erik Shaw
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Morag E Brookes; Sam Eldabe; Alan Batterham
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 7.363

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.