Literature DB >> 19562777

Clinical trial enrollment, patient characteristics, and survival differences in prospectively registered metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Halfdan Sorbye1, Per Pfeiffer, Nina Cavalli-Björkman, Camilla Qvortrup, Mari H Holsen, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, Bengt Glimelius.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trial accrual patterns were examined to determine whether metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients enrolled in trials are representative of a general cancer population concerning patient characteristics and survival.
METHODS: A total of 760 mCRC patients referred for their first oncological consideration at 3 hospitals in Scandinavia covering defined populations were registered consecutively during 2003 to 2006. Clinical trial enrollment, patient characteristics, and treatment were recorded prospectively, and the follow-up was complete.
RESULTS: Palliative chemotherapy was initiated in 61% of the patients. Approximately one-third (36%) of patients receiving chemotherapy were included in a trial. The main reason for nonparticipation was failed eligibility criteria (69%). The median survival after chemotherapy was 15.8 months for all patients, and 18 months after combination chemotherapy. Trial patients had better prognostic characteristics and significantly longer survival than nontrial patients: 21.3 months versus 15.2 months when receiving combination chemotherapy. Poor performance status was the main reason for giving best supportive care only, and the median survival was then only 2.1 months. The median survival for all 760 nonresectable mCRC patients was 10.7 months.
CONCLUSIONS: mCRC patients enrolled into clinical trials differ in characteristics from patients receiving chemotherapy outside protocol and have better survival, even when given the same treatment. Although trial patients have a median survival close to 2 years, survival is lower for all patients receiving chemotherapy and much lower for all patients diagnosed with mCRC. Studies that better accept the heterogeneity of the population with mCRC are needed. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19562777     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  41 in total

1.  Balancing the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Braun; Matthew T Seymour
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.

Authors:  P-F Zhang; F Wen; J Zhou; J-X Huang; K-X Zhou; Q-J Wu; X-Y Wang; M-X Zhang; W-T Liao; Q Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Survival and costs of colorectal cancer treatment and effects of changing treatment strategies: a model approach.

Authors:  Paal Joranger; Arild Nesbakken; Halfdan Sorbye; Geir Hoff; Arne Oshaug; Eline Aas
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-11-09

4.  How to overcome resistance to therapy?

Authors:  Camilla Qvortrup; Sabine Tejpar; Per Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-06

5.  The Effect of Receiving Treatment Within a Clinical Trial Setting on Survival and Quality of Care Perception in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Taher Abu-Hejleh; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Christian Simon; Jane F Pendergast; Dingfeng Jiang; Carmen J Smith; Aaron T Porter; Knute D Carter; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that do not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

Authors:  D Y C Heng; T K Choueiri; B I Rini; J Lee; T Yuasa; S K Pal; S Srinivas; G A Bjarnason; J J Knox; M Mackenzie; U N Vaishampayan; M H Tan; S Y Rha; F Donskov; N Agarwal; C Kollmannsberger; S North; L A Wood
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Organizational and physician factors associated with patient enrollment in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Sara R Jacobs; Bryan J Weiner; Bryce B Reeve; Morris Weinberger; Lori M Minasian; Marjorie J Good
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Clinical trial information as a measure of quality cancer care.

Authors:  Wei Chua; Stephen J Clarke
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Phase II Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Chemotherapy-Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with Unresectable RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602.

Authors:  Tetsuji Terazawa; Takeshi Kato; Masahiro Goto; Katsuya Ohta; Shingo Noura; Hironaga Satake; Yoshinori Kagawa; Hisato Kawakami; Hiroko Hasegawa; Kazuhiro Yanagihara; Tatsushi Shingai; Ken Nakata; Masahito Kotaka; Masayuki Hiraki; Ken Konishi; Shiro Nakae; Daisuke Sakai; Yukinori Kurokawa; Toshio Shimokawa; Taroh Satoh
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-28

10.  Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: from clinical trials to real-world practice.

Authors:  Sawsan Rashdan; David E Gerber
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.