Literature DB >> 19562747

In vitro response of monocyte-derived macrophages to a decellularized pericardial biomaterial.

Marianne B Ariganello1, Rosalind S Labow, J Michael Lee.   

Abstract

Decellularized tissue-derived heart valves are an example of biomaterials derived from natural scaffolds. These types of implants are increasing in popularity although their in vivo performance is still only poorly understood and has, at times, been catastrophic. It is apparent that better understanding is required before these biomaterials can be used safely. In this study, the human monocyte-derived macrophage (MDM) response to decellularized bovine pericardium (DBP) was used as a model to predict the biological performance of these materials on implantation. Human monocytes differentiated on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) for 14 days were trypsinized and reseeded onto DBP, TCPS, and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for 48 h. The MDMs on DBP contained less intracellular and extracellular esterase activity compared with MDMs on TCPS and PDMS, as well as less acid phosphatase activity than on TCPS. As well, morphologically, MDMs on DBP were less spread, less multinucleated and did not display many lamellipodia. Taken together, these data represent the first evidence of the MDM response to intact, native extracellular matrix, demonstrating that these cells reacted with an altered, possibly reduced foreign body response on this natural scaffold compared with the two control surfaces. This in vitro MDM cell model may provide a novel method for predicting and elucidating the biological performance of tissue-derived biomaterials, thereby directing a more rational design of biomaterials for tissue regeneration purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19562747     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  7 in total

1.  Pericardial tissue for cardiovascular application: an in-vitro evaluation of established and advanced production processes.

Authors:  L Grefen; F König; M Grab; C Hagl; N Thierfelder
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Predicting in vivo responses to biomaterials via combined in vitro and in silico analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Yoram Vodovotz; Stephen Tottey; Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Decellularized matrices for cardiovascular tissue engineering.

Authors:  Francesco Moroni; Teodelinda Mirabella
Journal:  Am J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-03-13

4.  Macrophage differentiation and polarization on a decellularized pericardial biomaterial.

Authors:  Marianne B Ariganello; Dan T Simionescu; Rosalind S Labow; J Michael Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Naturally derived biomaterials for addressing inflammation in tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hortensius; Brendan Ac Harley
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Tissue Engineering of Blood Vessels: Functional Requirements, Progress, and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Vivek A Kumar; Luke P Brewster; Jeffrey M Caves; Elliot L Chaikof
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 7.  Biodegradable Nanopolymers in Cardiac Tissue Engineering: From Concept Towards Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Saeed Mohammadi Nasr; Navid Rabiee; Sakineh Hajebi; Sepideh Ahmadi; Yousef Fatahi; Masoumehossadat Hosseini; Mojtaba Bagherzadeh; Amir Mohammad Ghadiri; Mohammad Rabiee; Vahid Jajarmi; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-06-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.