Literature DB >> 19562062

Angular ectopic pregnancy presenting as rupture of lateral wall of the uterus.

P S Baldawa1, H K Chaudhari.   

Abstract

This is a case report of a 32-year-old woman, being treated for secondary infertility, with history of previous ectopic pregnancy, who presented to the emergency obstetrical room in a state of hypovolemic shock. A diagnosis of ruptured ectopic pregnancy was confirmed in view of history of 14 weeks amenorrhea with a positive urine pregnancy test and positive colpopunture. She was immediately shifted for an emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively, the authors were surprised to encounter a right lateral wall rupture uterus and ~14 weeks foetus with the placenta lying freely in the peritoneal cavity. That was suggestive of a right interstitial ectopic which had grown up to 14 weeks, invaded the uterine cavity thus forming an angular ectopic, which ended up as the catastrophic event. The authors here wish to highlight that angular pregnancy is rare but it has catastrophic consequences including maternal mortality. Had the patient presented early, in view of history of previous ectopic, an ultrasonography and color Doppler would have been useful in early detection. And a fertility conserving management in the form of Methotrexate therapy or Selective Uterine artery embolization could have been done.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angular; ectopic; pregnancy

Year:  2008        PMID: 19562062      PMCID: PMC2700674          DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.38970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1998-4766


An interstitial ectopic pregnancy develops in the uterine portion of the fallopian tube. Angular pregnancy originates in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube and then grows into the adjacent uterine cavity. Thus an angular pregnancy is a continuation of an interstitial pregnancy. While interstitial pregnancies account for only 2-4% of all ectopic gestations,[1-3] they cause a disproportionately high incidence of hemoperitoneum and shock, and the mortality rate is approximately twice that of other types of ectopic pregnancies.[4] There are reported cases of rupture at all gestational ages, including full term pregnancy with surgical delivery.[4]

CASE HISTORY

A 32-year-old woman, Gravida3 Parity1 Living1 ectopic1, presented to the emergency obstetrical room in a state of hypovolemic shock. Her pulse rate was 140/min BP of 70 mm Hg, RR of 30/min. There was history of 14 weeks amenorrhea, urine pregnancy test was positive, colpopunture revealed fresh red blood which did not clot, suggestive of hemoperitoneum. Relatives gave history of previous ectopic pregnancy for which left-sided salpingectomy was done 3 years back. Two large bore intravenous accesses were made and compatible whole blood transfusion and fluid resuscitation was started. She was immediately shifted for an emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively, the authors encountered a right lateral wall rupture of the uterus and ~14 weeks foetus with the placenta lying freely in the peritoneal cavity, suggestive of rupture of a left angular ectopic pregnancy [Figure 1].
Figure 1

A right lateral wall uterine rupture and ~ 14 weeks foetus with the placenta

A right lateral wall uterine rupture and ~ 14 weeks foetus with the placenta As the uterus could not be salvaged, subtotal hysterectomy with right salpingectomy was done [Figure 2] (left tube being previously removed).
Figure 2

Subtotal hysterectomy with right salpingectomy

Subtotal hysterectomy with right salpingectomy She was shifted to the intensive care unit postoperatively. She required correction of her electrolyte imbalance and further blood transfusions during her recovery period. She was discharged on 12th postoperative day after complete recovery. The authors here wish to highlight that angular pregnancy is rare, but it has catastrophic consequences including maternal mortality. Had the patient presented early and in view of her history of previous ectopic, an ultrasonography and color Doppler would have been useful in early detection and a fertility preserving conservative line of management in the form of Methotrexate therapy or Selective Uterine artery embolization could have been done.

DISCUSSION

An interstitial pregnancy is an uncommon type of ectopic pregnancy, accounting for 2-4% of all ectopic pregnancies.[1-3] The interstitial portion of the fallopian tube is a highly vascular, muscular site that offers more support and distensibility to the embryo than any other portion of the fallopian tube. These anatomic features allow the gestation to advance much further into its development than when the embryo implants in other portions of the tube [Figure 3]. A gestational sac surrounded by an incomplete or asymmetric uterine myometrial mantle is highly indicative of an interstitial pregnancy.[45] Color Doppler sonography reveals flow associated with the gestational sac. A spectral tracing reveals a high velocity-low resistance pattern, characteristic of trophoblastic blood flow.[6] The exact classification of the various types of ectopic gestations is somewhat controversial. Gestations implanted within the ampullary or isthmic portions of the fallopian tube are referred to as tubal ectopics.
Figure 3

Classification of tubal ectopic pregnancies

Classification of tubal ectopic pregnancies Interstitial pregnancies occur when the gestation implants in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube. While some consider the terms interstitial and cornual pregnancies to be synonymous, others reserve the term cornual pregnancy for a gestation in one horn of a bicornuate or septate uterus.[1-4] A seldom used term, angular pregnancy, refers to a gestation in which the pregnancy extends beyond the interstitium into the adjacent uterine cavity.[16] In the case presented in this report, the gestation originated in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube and extended into the adjacent uterine cavity, therefore was classified as an angular pregnancy.
  5 in total

1.  Term interstitial pregnancy with uterine torsion: sonographic, pathologic, and clinical findings.

Authors:  A L Bond; J A Grifo; F A Chervenak; E E Kramer; M A Harris
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Ruptured interstitial pregnancy presenting as an intrauterine pregnancy by ultrasound.

Authors:  W E Maliha; P Gonella; E J Degnan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Ectopic pregnancy: duplex Doppler evaluation.

Authors:  K J Taylor; I M Ramos; A L Feyock; D P Snower; D Carter; B S Shapiro; W R Meyer; A H De Cherney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Sonographic detection of interstitial pregnancy.

Authors:  S Z Jafri; S J Loginsky; J A Bouffard; J E Selis
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial pregnancy.

Authors:  D J Coady; J R Snyder; S R Goldstein; B R Subramanyan
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1985-11
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Angular Ectopic Pregnancy Presenting as Rupture of Lateral Wall of the Uterus: Late Presentation in Gestation Week 20.

Authors:  Malihe Hasanzadeh; Salme Dadgar; Yalda Arian; Yousef Yousefi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.