Lygia T Budnik1, Xaver Baur. 1. Ordinariat für Arbeitsmedizin des Universitätsklinikums Hamburg-Eppendorf, Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern biomonitoring has expanded beyond its origins in occupational medicine to cover a wide variety of diagnostic procedures and assessments of environmental pollution, ranging from exposure to heavy metals and chemicals to the effects of pesticides and environmental tobacco smoke. In biomonitoring, the overall pollutant load and hazardous exposure of an organism is quantitatively determined, by monitoring the pollutants themselves, their metabolic products and/or conjugates with protein or DNA, in either serum, urine or other body fluids, as well as tissue samples in exceptional circumstances. METHODS: A selective survey of the current literature is exemplified by our recent scientific and clinical experience. RESULTS: Biomonitoring is an excellent way to monitor potentially hazardous substances, especially for the assessment of systemic uptake from chronic exposure and the evaluation of subsequent health risks. Investigative biomonitoring can highlight incidental/accidental intoxication in individuals and provide new categories of problematic pollutants relevant to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with diagnostic procedures, biomonitoring provides an important contribution to the rational assessment of currently recorded pollutants and resulting health risks. It is as an evaluation tool available in daily practice as well as in health and environmental research applications. Legislation is already implemented that incorporates biomonitoring within the remit of specified occupational health screening.
BACKGROUND: Modern biomonitoring has expanded beyond its origins in occupational medicine to cover a wide variety of diagnostic procedures and assessments of environmental pollution, ranging from exposure to heavy metals and chemicals to the effects of pesticides and environmental tobacco smoke. In biomonitoring, the overall pollutant load and hazardous exposure of an organism is quantitatively determined, by monitoring the pollutants themselves, their metabolic products and/or conjugates with protein or DNA, in either serum, urine or other body fluids, as well as tissue samples in exceptional circumstances. METHODS: A selective survey of the current literature is exemplified by our recent scientific and clinical experience. RESULTS: Biomonitoring is an excellent way to monitor potentially hazardous substances, especially for the assessment of systemic uptake from chronic exposure and the evaluation of subsequent health risks. Investigative biomonitoring can highlight incidental/accidental intoxication in individuals and provide new categories of problematic pollutants relevant to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with diagnostic procedures, biomonitoring provides an important contribution to the rational assessment of currently recorded pollutants and resulting health risks. It is as an evaluation tool available in daily practice as well as in health and environmental research applications. Legislation is already implemented that incorporates biomonitoring within the remit of specified occupational health screening.
Authors: Thomas R Frieden; Farzad Mostashari; Bonnie D Kerker; Nancy Miller; Anjum Hajat; Martin Frankel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jürgen Angerer; Michael G Bird; Thomas A Burke; Nancy G Doerrer; Larry Needham; Steven H Robison; Linda Sheldon; Hal Zenick Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2006-06-19 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Caroline Herr; Isabelle Otterbach; Dennis Nowak; Claudia Hornberg; Thomas Eikmann; Gerhard Andreas Wiesmüller Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: M K Prasannakumar; H B Mahesh; Radhika U Desai; Bharath Kunduru; Karthik S Narayan; Kalavati Teli; M E Puneeth; R C Rajadurai; Buella Parivallal; Gopal Venkatesh Babu Journal: 3 Biotech Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Maria Uhl; Ricardo R Santos; Joana Costa; Osvaldo Santos; Ana Virgolino; David S Evans; Cora Murray; Maurice Mulcahy; Dorothy Ubong; Ovnair Sepai; Joana Lobo Vicente; Michaela Leitner; Silvia Benda-Kahri; Daniela Zanini-Freitag Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 3.390