Literature DB >> 19561761

Bilateral cervical spine facet fracture-dislocation.

Shanda Gomes1, Scott Rudkin, Fong Tsai, Shahram Lotfipour.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19561761      PMCID: PMC2672293          DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2026.1998.tb00485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1936-900X


× No keyword cloud information.
An intoxicated 29-year-old male presented to the emergency department after diving into a pool with reported loss of consciousness and complaining of neck pain. On arrival the Glasgow Coma Scale was 15 and vital signs were unremarkable. Physical exam was significant for focal C6 tenderness without step-off deformity, decreased grip strength, biceps hyperreflexia and absent triceps reflexes bilaterally. Lower extremities demonstrated flaccid paralysis, loss of sensation from the T4 dermatome down, urinary retention and no rectal tone. Cervical spine computed tomography (CT) demonstrated bilateral fractured and dislocated facets C6 on C7. The patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone and admitted to the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, after undergoing C6–C7 anterior disk excision with subsequent posterior fusion. At discharge he had a C7 functional level with mixed motor deficits inferiorly. Bilateral facet dislocation occurs when a vertebra’s inferior facet dislocates anteriorly over the lower vertebra’s superior facet, locking in the intervertebral foramens, creating a severely unstable fracture.2,3 CT has a higher sensitivity for C-spine injury and is the preferred imaging modality.2 Sagittal reconstructions best identify the dislocated, locked facets; axial views can demonstrate a “reverse-hamburger-bun sign.”2 While facet dislocation injuries are rare, representing less than 10% of C-spine injuries, the neurologic morbidity is tragically high.1,3 Common mechanisms for this injury include motor vehicle collisions (61%) and diving accidents (15%), where extreme flexion and axial loading occur. 1 Ivancic et al.3 reported that the dynamic narrowing of the spinal canal during the dislocation is sevenfold greater than the narrowing observed in the canal immediately post dislocation; thus, CT images may under-appreciate the extent of the injury. Complete spinal cord injury is not uncommon.1,2
  3 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography diagnosis of facet dislocations: the "hamburger bun" and "reverse hamburger bun" signs.

Authors:  Scott D Daffner; Richard H Daffner
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Facet fracture-dislocation injuries of the cervical spine.

Authors:  M N Hadley; B C Fitzpatrick; V K Sonntag; C M Browner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Mechanism of cervical spinal cord injury during bilateral facet dislocation.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Adam M Pearson; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Andrew K Simpson; James J Yue; Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.