PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate prognostic factors for survival in patients with uveal melanoma who received chemoembolization (CE) with 1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea or immunoembolization (IE) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients with uveal melanoma were treated by using CE or IE in clinical trials approved by the Institutional Review Board. Prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the liver and extrahepatic (systemic) organs were retrospectively evaluated. Covariates of age, sex, preexisting extrahepatic metastases, liver enzyme levels, tumor volume, radiologic response in hepatic metastases, and treatment type were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with CE, high-dose (>or=1500 microg of GM-CSF) IE resulted in significantly better OS (20.4 vs 9.8 months, P = .005) and systemic PFS (12.4 vs 4.8 months, P = .001) at univariate analysis. Overall, women outlived men (14.4 vs 9.8 months, P = .01). Patients who achieved regression of hepatic metastases after embolization lived much longer than did those who did not achieve regression (27.2 vs 9.9 months, P < .001). At multivariate analysis, prolonged OS was confirmed for women, patients who underwent high-dose IE, younger patients (age < 60 years), and patients with regression of hepatic metastases. Independent predictors of longer systemic PFS included high-dose IE, younger age, and regression of hepatic metastases. No covariate predicted liver PFS except for hepatic response. CONCLUSION: Treatment with high-dose IE prolonged survival of patients with uveal melanoma who received embolization of hepatic metastases and possibly delayed progression of extrahepatic metastases. (c) RSNA, 2009.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate prognostic factors for survival in patients with uveal melanoma who received chemoembolization (CE) with 1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea or immunoembolization (IE) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients with uveal melanoma were treated by using CE or IE in clinical trials approved by the Institutional Review Board. Prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the liver and extrahepatic (systemic) organs were retrospectively evaluated. Covariates of age, sex, preexisting extrahepatic metastases, liver enzyme levels, tumor volume, radiologic response in hepatic metastases, and treatment type were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with CE, high-dose (>or=1500 microg of GM-CSF) IE resulted in significantly better OS (20.4 vs 9.8 months, P = .005) and systemic PFS (12.4 vs 4.8 months, P = .001) at univariate analysis. Overall, women outlived men (14.4 vs 9.8 months, P = .01). Patients who achieved regression of hepatic metastases after embolization lived much longer than did those who did not achieve regression (27.2 vs 9.9 months, P < .001). At multivariate analysis, prolonged OS was confirmed for women, patients who underwent high-dose IE, younger patients (age < 60 years), and patients with regression of hepatic metastases. Independent predictors of longer systemic PFS included high-dose IE, younger age, and regression of hepatic metastases. No covariate predicted liver PFS except for hepatic response. CONCLUSION: Treatment with high-dose IE prolonged survival of patients with uveal melanoma who received embolization of hepatic metastases and possibly delayed progression of extrahepatic metastases. (c) RSNA, 2009.
Authors: Seppo Pyrhönen; Marjo Hahka-Kemppinen; Timo Muhonen; Väinämö Nikkanen; Sebastian Eskelin; Paula Summanen; Ahti Tarkkanen; Tero Kivelä Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J C Becker; P Terheyden; E Kämpgen; S Wagner; C Neumann; D Schadendorf; A Steinmann; G Wittenberg; W Lieb; E-B Bröcker Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-10-07 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Harriet Eldredge-Hindy; Nitin Ohri; Pramila R Anne; David Eschelman; Carin Gonsalves; Charles Intenzo; Voichita Bar-Ad; Adam Dicker; Laura Doyle; Jun Li; Takami Sato Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Carin F Gonsalves; David J Eschelman; Robert D Adamo; P Rani Anne; Marlana M Orloff; Mizue Terai; Anthony N Hage; Misung Yi; Inna Chervoneva; Takami Sato Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marybeth S Hughes; Jonathan Zager; Mark Faries; H Richard Alexander; Richard E Royal; Bradford Wood; Junsung Choi; Kevin McCluskey; Eric Whitman; Sanjiv Agarwala; Gary Siskin; Charles Nutting; Mary Ann Toomey; Carole Webb; Tatiana Beresnev; James F Pingpank Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Peachy Mae Piana; Voichita Bar; Laura Doyle; Rani Anne; Takami Sato; David J Eschelman; Jeffrey W McCann; Carin F Gonsalves; Daniel B Brown Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 3.647