Literature DB >> 19560139

EUS-guided FNA aspiration of kidney masses: a multicenter U.S. experience.

John DeWitt1, Frank G Gress, Michael J Levy, Lyndon V Hernandez, Mohamad A Eloubeidi, Girish Mishra, Stuart Sherman, Mohammad A Al-Haddad, Julia K LeBlanc.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tissue sampling of renal lesions is traditionally performed with percutaneous US or CT guidance. To date, only 3 known cases of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of a renal mass have been reported.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a multicenter experience with the indications, yield, and complications from attempted EUS-FNA of a kidney mass.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Six tertiary referral hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Consecutive subjects undergoing attempted EUS-FNA of a kidney mass. Endosonographers at 15 other teaching hospitals were contacted regarding EUS findings and follow-up of any EUS-guided renal biopsies previously attempted or considered at that institution.
INTERVENTIONS: EUS-FNA of a kidney mass. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Biopsy indications, yield, diagnosis, and complications.
RESULTS: Fifteen procedures in 15 patients (9 men; median age 67 years) were performed at 6 (37%) of 16 hospitals (Indiana University plus 15 other hospitals). Kidney masses (median diameter 32 mm; range 11-60 mm) were located in the upper (n = 12) and lower (n = 3) poles of the left (n = 10) and right (n = 5) kidneys, respectively. Initial mass detection was by previous imaging in 13 (87%) patients or by EUS in 2 (13%) patients. Results of EUS-FNA (median 3 passes; range 2-4 passes) in 13 (87%) procedures were diagnostic of (n = 7) or highly suspicious for (n = 1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), atypical cells (n = 2), oncocytoma (n = 1), benign cyst (n = 1), and nondiagnostic (n = 1). No complications were encountered. Surgical resection confirmed RCC in 7 patients in whom preoperative EUS-FNA demonstrated RCC (n = 5) or oncocytoma (n = 1) or was not performed (n = 1). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective series, small number of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA of renal masses is rarely performed at the U.S. teaching hospitals surveyed. This technique appears safe and feasible and should be considered when results would affect patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19560139     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration: Technique and applications in clinical practice.

Authors:  Benjamin Tharian; Fotios Tsiopoulos; Nayana George; Salvatore Di Pietro; Fabia Attili; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-16

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of kidney lesions: A review.

Authors:  Roberto Iglesias Lopes; Renata Nobre Moura; Everson Artifon
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

3.  Thymic carcinoma diagnosed by using endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  Pragnesh Patel; Julie Guider; Erik Rahimi; Sushovan Guha; Songlin Zhang; Nirav Thosani
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

4.  Expanding the horizons of endoscopic ultrasound: diagnosis of non-digestive pathologies.

Authors:  Georgios Mavrogenis; Hocine Hassaini; Alain Sibille; Sofia Feloni; Pierre H Deprez; Cédric Gillain; Philippe Warzée
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-01-08

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided trans-duodenal biopsy of a renal mass: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Angela Piccirilli; Federico Romantini; Pietro Saldutto; Guevar Maselli; Giuseppe Paradiso; Carlo Vicentini
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.