Literature DB >> 19559926

Clinical experience with Matrix2 360 degrees coils in the treatment of 100 intracranial aneurysms.

Sabino J D'Agostino1, Mark R Harrigan, Julio A Chalela, Joyce S Nicholas, Susan I Deveikis, Tanya M Jones, John P Deveikis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The M2-360 degrees is a recent class of aneurysm coil. This device combines the second generation of bioactive copolymer coating, which is intended to promote aneurysm fibrosis, with the "360 degrees " design, which is meant to improve uniformity and density of packing. This study evaluates the safety and angiographic stability of these devices.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 86 consecutive patients with 100 intracranial aneurysms that were treated using M2-360 degrees s. Follow-up was done at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight aneurysms were coiled solely with M2-360 degrees s, and 22 aneurysms were treated with a combination of coils. In mixed-coil cases, the average percentage of coil volume consisting of M2-360 degrees coils was 78%. Procedure-related neurologic complications occurred in 6 patients (7%). Initial complete occlusion was obtained in 80 aneurysms. Of 76 aneurysms with 6-month angiographic follow-up, 4 (5.3%) revealed further occlusion, 54 (71.1%) were unchanged, and 18 (23.7%) showed recanalization. Of 38 aneurysms with 12-month follow-up, 1 (2.6%) revealed further occlusion, 23 (60.5%) were unchanged, and 14 (36.8%) showed recanalization. Six- and 12-month angiograms showed major recanalization (requiring further coiling) in 3.9% and 15.8% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of complications with M2-360 degrees -treated aneurysms is comparable with reports of other coils, indicating that M2-360 degrees s are relatively safe. Although the initial occlusion rate is higher than that in other coiling series, recanalization rates were similar to those obtained with other coil designs. This study does not demonstrate an advantage with M2-360 degrees s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19559926     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  5 in total

1.  Matrix² coils in embolization of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year outcome and comparison with bare platinum coil group in a single institution.

Authors:  S W Youn; S-H Cha; H-S Kang; Y D Cho; M H Han
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by 2-D Versus 3-D Coils: A Matched-Pairs Analysis.

Authors:  S Lang; J Rösch; P Gölitz; S Kloska; T Struffert; A Doerfler
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  Design and biocompatibility of endovascular aneurysm filling devices.

Authors:  Jennifer N Rodriguez; Wonjun Hwang; John Horn; Todd L Landsman; Anthony Boyle; Mark A Wierzbicki; Sayyeda M Hasan; Douglas Follmer; Jesse Bryant; Ward Small; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial.

Authors:  P K Nelson; P Lylyk; I Szikora; S G Wetzel; I Wanke; D Fiorella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Six-Month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Mojtaba Miri; Hossein Ghanaati; Payman Salamati; Hojat Ebrahimi Nik; Amir Hossein Jalali; Mina Saeednejad; Kavous Firouznia
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 0.212

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.