BACKGROUND: The detection of high-grade dysplasia and cancer in Barrett's esophagus (BE) can be challenging. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows in vivo visualization of mucosal histology during endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CLE with optical biopsy and targeted mucosal biopsy improves the diagnostic yield of endoscopically inapparent, BE-associated neoplasia compared to standard endoscopy with a 4-quadrant, random biopsy protocol. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, crossover study. SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic center. PATIENTS: This study involved patients with BE undergoing routine surveillance or referred for treatment of nonlocalized, endoscopically inapparent, BE-associated neoplasia. INTERVENTION: All participants underwent both a confocal endomicroscopy with a targeted biopsy procedure and standard endoscopy with a 4-quadrant biopsy procedure in a randomized order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Increase in diagnostic yield for neoplasia, reduction in mucosal biopsy number, final pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS:CLE with targeted biopsy almost doubled the diagnostic yield for neoplasia and was equivalent to the standard protocol for the final diagnosis of neoplasia. Two thirds of patients in the surveillance group did not need any mucosal biopsies at all. LIMITATION: Single-center study. CONCLUSION:CLE with targeted biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield for endoscopically inapparent BE neoplasia compared to a standard endoscopy with a random-biopsy protocol. CLE with targeted biopsy also greatly reduces the number of biopsies needed per patient and allows some patients without neoplasia to completely forgo mucosal biopsy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The detection of high-grade dysplasia and cancer in Barrett's esophagus (BE) can be challenging. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows in vivo visualization of mucosal histology during endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CLE with optical biopsy and targeted mucosal biopsy improves the diagnostic yield of endoscopically inapparent, BE-associated neoplasia compared to standard endoscopy with a 4-quadrant, random biopsy protocol. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, crossover study. SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic center. PATIENTS: This study involved patients with BE undergoing routine surveillance or referred for treatment of nonlocalized, endoscopically inapparent, BE-associated neoplasia. INTERVENTION: All participants underwent both a confocal endomicroscopy with a targeted biopsy procedure and standard endoscopy with a 4-quadrant biopsy procedure in a randomized order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Increase in diagnostic yield for neoplasia, reduction in mucosal biopsy number, final pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS:CLE with targeted biopsy almost doubled the diagnostic yield for neoplasia and was equivalent to the standard protocol for the final diagnosis of neoplasia. Two thirds of patients in the surveillance group did not need any mucosal biopsies at all. LIMITATION: Single-center study. CONCLUSION:CLE with targeted biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield for endoscopically inapparent BE neoplasia compared to a standard endoscopy with a random-biopsy protocol. CLE with targeted biopsy also greatly reduces the number of biopsies needed per patient and allows some patients without neoplasia to completely forgo mucosal biopsy.
Authors: M A Kara; F P Peters; W D Rosmolen; K K Krishnadath; F J ten Kate; P Fockens; J J G H Bergman Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe Journal: Gut Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: L R Lundell; J Dent; J R Bennett; A L Blum; D Armstrong; J P Galmiche; F Johnson; M Hongo; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin Journal: Gut Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Ralf Kiesslich; Juergen Burg; Michael Vieth; Janina Gnaendiger; Meike Enders; Peter Delaney; Adrian Polglase; Wendy McLaren; Daniela Janell; Steven Thomas; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Neil G Terry; Yizheng Zhu; Matthew T Rinehart; William J Brown; Steven C Gebhart; Stephanie Bright; Elizabeth Carretta; Courtney G Ziefle; Masoud Panjehpour; Joseph Galanko; Ryan D Madanick; Evan S Dellon; Dimitri Trembath; Ana Bennett; John R Goldblum; Bergein F Overholt; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen; Adam Wax Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-09-18 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Marcia Irene Canto; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; William Brugge; Gary W Falk; Kerry B Dunbar; Zhe Zhang; Kevin Woods; Jose Antonio Almario; Ursula Schell; John Goldblum; Anirban Maitra; Elizabeth Montgomery; Ralf Kiesslich Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 9.427