Literature DB >> 1955919

Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxilla: a preliminary report.

J Jensen1, S Sindet-Pedersen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present results obtained with a new procedure for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxillary alveolar ridge that involves the use of intramembranous corticocancellous bone grafts obtained from the mandibular symphysis fixed to the residual bone by endosseous implants. A total of 107 implants were installed in grafted regions in 26 patients. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 32 months, with a mean of 16 months. In partially edentulous patients the bone grafts were fixed with implants to the residual bone as 1) onlay graft to the alveolar ridge (8 implants in 4 patients); 2) grafts to the nasal and/or sinus floor after a transoral exposure and elevation of the mucosa of the maxillary sinus and/or the nasal mucosa (33 implants in 11 patients); or 3) a combination of these two (5 implants in 2 patients). In totally edentulous patients, implants and grafts were used as a combination of grafting to both the alveolar ridge and nasal and/or sinus floor sites (61 implants in 9 patients). One hundred of 107 implants showed normal clinical and radiologic healing, whereas 7 implants in 4 patients (6.5%) were lost prior to loading. Seventeen patients have had the implants and bone grafts loaded by a prosthodontic reconstruction from 6 to 26 months (mean, 14 months) without loss of any implants. Postoperative marginal resorption of the onlay bone graft of less than 15% was observed. These findings suggest, that the previously observed rapid resorption of endochondral iliac crest onlay bone grafts and the number of lost implants can be significantly reduced if bone from the mandibular symphysis firmly anchored with titanium implants is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1955919     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90303-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  21 in total

1.  Histometric analyses of cancellous and cortical interface in autogenous bone grafting.

Authors:  Henrique Duque Netto; Sergio Olate; Leandro Klüppel; Antonio Marcio Resende do Carmo; Bélgica Vásquez; Jose Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-07-15

2.  [Comparison of the peripheral and central effects of opiates after iliac crest transplants. Reconstruction of severely atrophied maxilla].

Authors:  A S Virnik; A Gaggl; R Likar; H Stettner; F M Chiari
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the different donor sites of the mandible for autologous bone grafts.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Nicole Heussen; Nassim Ayoub; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  [Sinus floor elevation and augmentation. Evidence-based analysis of prognosis and risk factors].

Authors:  F P Strietzel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-02-06

5.  Remodeling of autogenous bone grafts after osteotome sinus floor elevation assessed by limited cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Tetsuya Nishida; Yuka Takenouchi; Kyoko Mori; Miyuki Ariji; Kaori Nishida; Koichi Ito
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-07-14

6.  Alveolar ridge augmentation with the perforated and nonperforated bone grafts.

Authors:  Erica Dorigatti de Avila; José Scarso Filho; Lizete Toledo de Oliveira Ramalho; Mario Francisco Real Gabrielli; Valfrido Antônio Pereira Filho
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Maxillary reconstruction to enable implant insertion: a retrospective study of 181 patients.

Authors:  Joël Ferri; Jean-Pascal Dujoncquoy; José Mario Carneiro; Gwénael Raoul
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Autogenous bone block in the treatment of teeth with hopeless prognosis.

Authors:  Nymphea Pandit; I K Pandit; Rajvir Malik; Deepika Bali; Shaifi Jindal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10

9.  Direct vs. indirect sinus lift procedure: A comparison.

Authors:  U S Pal; Nanda Kishor Sharma; R K Singh; Shadab Mahammad; Divya Mehrotra; Nimisha Singh; Devendra Mandhyan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01

10.  Alveolar antral artery isolation during sinus lift procedure with the double window technique.

Authors:  Paolo Maridati; Enrico Stoffella; Stefano Speroni; Marco Cicciu; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.