OBJECTIVE: Gene expression profiles become increasingly more important for diagnostic procedures, allowing clinical predictions including treatment response and outcome. However, the establishment of specific and robust gene signatures from microarray data sets requires the analysis of large numbers of patients and the application of complex biostatistical algorithms. Especially in case of rare diseases and due to these constrains, diagnostic centers with limited access to patients or bioinformatic resources are excluded from implementing these new technologies. METHOD: In our study we sought to overcome these limitations and for proof of principle, we analyzed the rare t(4;11) leukemia disease entity. First, gene expression data of each t(4;11) leukemia patient were normalized by pairwise subtraction against normal bone marrow (n = 3) to identify significantly deregulated gene sets for each patient. RESULT: A 'core signature' of 186 commonly deregulated genes present in each investigated t(4;11) leukemia patient was defined. Linking the obtained gene sets to four biological discriminators (HOXA gene expression, age at diagnosis, fusion gene transcripts and chromosomal breakpoints) divided patients into two distinct subgroups: the first one comprised infant patients with low HOXA genes expression and the MLL breakpoints within introns 11/12. The second one comprised non-infant patients with high HOXA expression and MLL breakpoints within introns 9/10. CONCLUSION: A yet homogeneous leukemia entity was further subdivided, based on distinct genetic properties. This approach provided a simplified way to obtain robust and disease-specific gene signatures even in smaller cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: Gene expression profiles become increasingly more important for diagnostic procedures, allowing clinical predictions including treatment response and outcome. However, the establishment of specific and robust gene signatures from microarray data sets requires the analysis of large numbers of patients and the application of complex biostatistical algorithms. Especially in case of rare diseases and due to these constrains, diagnostic centers with limited access to patients or bioinformatic resources are excluded from implementing these new technologies. METHOD: In our study we sought to overcome these limitations and for proof of principle, we analyzed the rare t(4;11) leukemia disease entity. First, gene expression data of each t(4;11) leukemiapatient were normalized by pairwise subtraction against normal bone marrow (n = 3) to identify significantly deregulated gene sets for each patient. RESULT: A 'core signature' of 186 commonly deregulated genes present in each investigated t(4;11) leukemiapatient was defined. Linking the obtained gene sets to four biological discriminators (HOXA gene expression, age at diagnosis, fusion gene transcripts and chromosomal breakpoints) divided patients into two distinct subgroups: the first one comprised infantpatients with low HOXA genes expression and the MLL breakpoints within introns 11/12. The second one comprised non-infantpatients with high HOXA expression and MLL breakpoints within introns 9/10. CONCLUSION: A yet homogeneous leukemia entity was further subdivided, based on distinct genetic properties. This approach provided a simplified way to obtain robust and disease-specific gene signatures even in smaller cohorts.
Authors: Kira Orlovsky; Alexander Kalinkovich; Tanya Rozovskaia; Elias Shezen; Tomer Itkin; Hansjuerg Alder; Hatice Gulcin Ozer; Letizia Carramusa; Abraham Avigdor; Stefano Volinia; Arthur Buchberg; Alex Mazo; Orit Kollet; Corey Largman; Carlo M Croce; Tatsuya Nakamura; Tsvee Lapidot; Eli Canaani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: S Haihua Chu; Evelyn J Song; Jonathan R Chabon; Janna Minehart; Chloe N Matovina; Jessica L Makofske; Elizabeth S Frank; Kenneth Ross; Richard P Koche; Zhaohui Feng; Haiming Xu; Andrei Krivtsov; Andre Nussenzweig; Scott A Armstrong Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-10-09
Authors: Huining Kang; Carla S Wilson; Richard C Harvey; I-Ming Chen; Maurice H Murphy; Susan R Atlas; Edward J Bedrick; Meenakshi Devidas; Andrew J Carroll; Blaine W Robinson; Ronald W Stam; Maria G Valsecchi; Rob Pieters; Nyla A Heerema; Joanne M Hilden; Carolyn A Felix; Gregory H Reaman; Bruce Camitta; Naomi Winick; William L Carroll; ZoAnn E Dreyer; Stephen P Hunger; Cheryl L Willman Journal: Blood Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Clara Bueno; Rosa Montes; Gustavo J Melen; Verónica Ramos-Mejia; Pedro J Real; Verónica Ayllón; Laura Sanchez; Gertrudis Ligero; Iván Gutierrez-Aranda; Agustín F Fernández; Mario F Fraga; Inmaculada Moreno-Gimeno; Deborah Burks; María del Carmen Plaza-Calonge; Juan C Rodríguez-Manzaneque; Pablo Menendez Journal: Cell Res Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 25.617
Authors: Jayeeta Roychoudhury; Jason P Clark; Gabriel Gracia-Maldonado; Zeenath Unnisa; Mark Wunderlich; Kevin A Link; Nupur Dasgupta; Bruce Aronow; Gang Huang; James C Mulloy; Ashish R Kumar Journal: Blood Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Diana Schotte; Ellen A M Lange-Turenhout; Dominique J P M Stumpel; Ronald W Stam; Jessica G C A M Buijs-Gladdines; Jules P P Meijerink; Rob Pieters; Monique L Den Boer Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: José L Walewski; Fengxia Ge; Michel Gagner; William B Inabnet; Alfons Pomp; Andrea D Branch; Paul D Berk Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Adam C Wilkinson; Erica Ballabio; Huimin Geng; Phillip North; Marta Tapia; Jon Kerry; Debabrata Biswas; Robert G Roeder; C David Allis; Ari Melnick; Marella F T R de Bruijn; Thomas A Milne Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 9.423