Literature DB >> 19558419

Laser selection significantly affects cell viability following single-cell nanosurgery.

Maxwell B Zeigler1, Daniel T Chiu.   

Abstract

This paper compares the viability of over 700 NG108 cells after membrane disruption either with a single 3 ns pulse at 337 nm or with a 5 ms train of 110 fs pulses (80 MHz) at 770 nm. Cell viability was monitored over a period of 12 h so as to understand the effect of laser ablation-induced cell apoptosis. The use of one-photon membrane disruption with the UV-laser resulted in approximately 36% cell viability after 12 h while the use of two-photon ablation with the femtosecond laser resulted in a much higher viability of approximately 79% after 12 h, which was the same within error of the approximately 79% viability of cells in the control group. Changing the laser power to achieve a 90% probability of membrane disruption (PMD) from 50% PMD did not change the percentage of viable cells after 12 h, regardless of whether one- or two-photon ablation was employed. A systematic comparison between different methods of cellular ablation and their effect upon the viability of single cells has not been done before over such a long time frame. These results show the importance of laser choice when cell viability postsurgery is a concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19558419      PMCID: PMC5600466          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00581.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  24 in total

1.  Role of laser-induced plasma formation in pulsed cellular microsurgery and micromanipulation.

Authors:  Vasan Venugopalan; Arnold Guerra; Kester Nahen; Alfred Vogel
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-02-04       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Targeted transfection by femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Uday K Tirlapur; Karsten König
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pulse energy dependence of subcellular dissection by femtosecond laser pulses.

Authors:  A Heisterkamp; I Z Maxwell; E Mazur; J M Underwood; J A Nickerson; S Kumar; D E Ingber
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Optical trapping.

Authors:  Keir C Neuman; Steven M Block
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.523

5.  Examination of laser microbeam cell lysis in a PDMS microfluidic channel using time-resolved imaging.

Authors:  Pedro A Quinto-Su; Hsuan-Hong Lai; Helen H Yoon; Christopher E Sims; Nancy L Allbritton; Vasan Venugopalan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Femtosecond optical transfection of cells: viability and efficiency.

Authors:  D Stevenson; B Agate; X Tsampoula; P Fischer; C T A Brown; W Sibbett; A Riches; F Gunn-Moore; K Dholakia
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  A synergy of technologies: combining laser microsurgery with green fluorescent protein tagging.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; R W Cole; C L Rieder
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  1997

8.  Targeted gene transfer in eucaryotic cells by dye-assisted laser optoporation.

Authors:  G Palumbo; M Caruso; E Crescenzi; M F Tecce; G Roberti; A Colasanti
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.252

9.  Direct gene transfer into human cultured cells facilitated by laser micropuncture of the cell membrane.

Authors:  W Tao; J Wilkinson; E J Stanbridge; M W Berns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Monitoring cell survival after extraction of a single subcellular organelle using optical trapping and pulsed-nitrogen laser ablation.

Authors:  J Patrick Shelby; J Scott Edgar; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.421

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optoporation and genetic manipulation of cells using femtosecond laser pulses.

Authors:  Andrew A Davis; Matthew J Farrar; Nozomi Nishimura; Moonsoo M Jin; Chris B Schaffer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Laser photolysis of dye-sensitized nanocapsules occurs via a photothermal pathway.

Authors:  Kimberly A Dendramis; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  The potential impact of droplet microfluidics in biology.

Authors:  Thomas Schneider; Jason Kreutz; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Single-cell nanosurgery.

Authors:  Maxwell B Zeigler; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

5.  Vascularization of Cell-Laden Microfibres by Femtosecond Laser Processing.

Authors:  Isabel Verit; Laura Gemini; Julie Preterre; Pierre Pfirmann; Hugo Bakis; Jean-Christophe Fricain; Rainer Kling; Claire Rigothier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.