Literature DB >> 19558293

Modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Ko Matsudaira1, Takashi Yamazaki, Atsushi Seichi, Kazuto Hoshi, Nobuhiro Hara, Satoshi Ogiwara, Sei Terayama, Hirotaka Chikuda, Katsushi Takeshita, Kozo Nakamura.   

Abstract

The authors developed an original procedure, modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty (MFRS) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The first step is to cut the spinous process in an L-shape, which is caudally reflected. This procedure allows easy access to the spinal canal, including lateral recesses, and makes it easy to perform a trumpet-style decompression of the nerve roots without violating the facet joints. After the decompression of neural tissues, the spinous process is anatomically restored (spinoplasty). The clinical outcomes at 2 years were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale and patients' satisfaction. Radiological follow-up included radiographs and CT. Between January 2000 and December 2002, 109 patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication with or without mild spondylolisthesis underwent MFRS. Of these, 101 were followed up for at least 2 years (follow-up rate 93%). The average score on the self-administered JOA scale in 89 patients without comorbidity causing gait disturbance improved from 13.3 preoperatively to 22.9 at 2 years' follow-up. Neurogenic intermittent claudication disappeared in all cases. The patients' assessment of treatment satisfaction was "satisfied" in 74 cases, "slightly satisfied" in 12, "slightly dissatisfied" in 2, and "dissatisfied" in 1 case. In 16 cases (18%), a minimum progression of slippage occurred, but no symptomatic instability or recurrent stenosis was observed. Computed tomography showed that the lateral part of the facet joints was well preserved, and the mean residual ratio was 80%. The MFRS technique produces an adequate and safe decompression of the spinal canal, even in patients with narrow and steep facet joints in whom conventional fenestration is technically demanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19558293     DOI: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  3 in total

1.  Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hara; Hiroyuki Oka; Takashi Yamazaki; Katsushi Takeshita; Motoaki Murakami; Kazuto Hoshi; Sei Terayama; Atsushi Seichi; Kozo Nakamura; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Trumpet laminectomy microdecompression for lumbal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Jefri Henky; Muneyoshi Yasuda; Muhammad Zafrullah Arifin; Masakazu Takayasu; Ahmad Faried
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-10-18

3.  Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery.

Authors:  A H McGregor; C J Doré; T P Morris; S Morris; K Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.