OBJECT: Most upper cervical spine injuries are able to heal conservatively by halo vest application. The acceptance of the halo is different among patients due to the weight of the apparatus and the limited mobility it causes. Additionally, the fracture healing rate in older patients seems to be inferior to that in younger patients, which would make an operative stabilization procedure more appropriate for the elderly. Furthermore, the risk of complications is assumed to be higher in older people. The purpose of this retrospective study was to find out if there are differences in the clinical and radiological results and in complication rates between 2 patient groups with upper cervical spine injuries and halo vest treatment with special interest of their age group. METHODS: A total of 29 patients with upper cervical spine injuries were treated by halo vest application. The clinical and radiological results and the complication and revision surgery rates were identified. Patients were divided into 2 groups (18 patients were < 65 years and 11 were > 65 years), and the results were evaluated to examine whether there were any differences. RESULTS: The clinical and radiological results and the complication rate were not statistically significantly different between the 2 patient groups; however, there was a tendency for a longer time interval for fracture healing and more complications in the elderly people. CONCLUSIONS: If the conditions for conservative treatment of upper cervical spine injuries with halo fixation are right, the clinical and radiological results are good and almost similar in patients regardless of their age, although there is a tendency for more complications in older people.
OBJECT: Most upper cervical spine injuries are able to heal conservatively by halo vest application. The acceptance of the halo is different among patients due to the weight of the apparatus and the limited mobility it causes. Additionally, the fracture healing rate in older patients seems to be inferior to that in younger patients, which would make an operative stabilization procedure more appropriate for the elderly. Furthermore, the risk of complications is assumed to be higher in older people. The purpose of this retrospective study was to find out if there are differences in the clinical and radiological results and in complication rates between 2 patient groups with upper cervical spine injuries and halo vest treatment with special interest of their age group. METHODS: A total of 29 patients with upper cervical spine injuries were treated by halo vest application. The clinical and radiological results and the complication and revision surgery rates were identified. Patients were divided into 2 groups (18 patients were < 65 years and 11 were > 65 years), and the results were evaluated to examine whether there were any differences. RESULTS: The clinical and radiological results and the complication rate were not statistically significantly different between the 2 patient groups; however, there was a tendency for a longer time interval for fracture healing and more complications in the elderly people. CONCLUSIONS: If the conditions for conservative treatment of upper cervical spine injuries with halo fixation are right, the clinical and radiological results are good and almost similar in patients regardless of their age, although there is a tendency for more complications in older people.
Authors: Younis Kamal; M S Ortho; Hayat Ahmad Khan; Naseemul Gani; Ansar Ul Haq; Snobar Gul; Dara Singh Journal: Int J Health Sci (Qassim) Date: 2014-10
Authors: Jun Jae Shin; Sang Jin Kim; Tae Hong Kim; Hyung Shik Shin; Yong Soon Hwang; Sang Keun Park Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Joseph DiDomenico; Kingsley Abode-Iyamah; Ryan Khanna; Helena Roberts; Patrick A Hitchon; Zachary A Smith; Nader S Dahdaleh Journal: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Date: 2017 Oct-Dec
Authors: El Fatemi Nizare; Bouchaouch Abdelali; Derkaoui Hassani Fahd; Oudrhiri Mohammed Yassad; Gana Rachid; El Maaqili Rachid; Bellakhdar Fouad Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2013-06-20