Literature DB >> 19558027

A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment.

Rosemary J Herbert1, Anita J Gagnon, Janet E Rennick, Jennifer L O'Loughlin.   

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to identify questionnaires that measure health-related empowerment in adults or families and demonstrated the best evidence of reliability and validity. A search of nine data bases identified 8,269 abstracts that referred to empowerment. Full article review was completed for abstracts that met the inclusion criteria or that could not be excluded with certainty (n = 124). Fifty distinct, modified, or translated questionnaires measuring empowerment were identified in 74 articles. Each was rated in terms of reliability and validity. One questionnaire had good evidence of reliability and validity, four had moderate evidence, and 45 had limited or no evidence. Limited or no evidence for reliability and validity for many questionnaires could relate in part to lack of consensus on the theoretical definition of, and indicators for measuring empowerment. We recommend that researchers use the questionnaire rated as having good evidence and that data on reliability and validity continue to be reported for other questionnaires.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19558027     DOI: 10.1891/1541-6577.23.2.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1541-6577            Impact factor:   0.688


  19 in total

1.  Measuring Family Caregiver Perceptions of Support in Caring for Children and Youth With Mental Health Concerns.

Authors:  Tamara S Davis; Stephen M Gavazzi; Scott D Scheer; Il An Kwon; Alexandra Lammers; Mary A Fristad; Reena Uppal
Journal:  J Soc Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-07

2.  The Utility of the Family Empowerment Scale With Custodial Grandmothers.

Authors:  Bert Hayslip; Gregory C Smith; Julian Montoro-Rodriguez; Frederick H Streider; William Merchant
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2016-07-09

Review 3.  Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Isabelle Scholl; Paulina Bravo; Marjan J Faber; Glyn Elwyn; Marion McAllister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Paulina Bravo; Adrian Edwards; Paul James Barr; Isabelle Scholl; Glyn Elwyn; Marion McAllister
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Effectiveness of a Web-based tailored interactive health communication application for patients with type 2 diabetes or chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nina Weymann; Jörg Dirmaier; Alessa von Wolff; Levente Kriston; Martin Härter
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Educational interventions to empower nursing home residents: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Daniela Schoberer; Helena Leino-Kilpi; Helga E Breimaier; Ruud Jg Halfens; Christa Lohrmann
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Crystal L Patil; Carrie S Klima; Sebalda C Leshabari; Alana D Steffen; Heather Pauls; Molly McGown; Kathleen F Norr
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Patient Perceptions of Empowerment Scale (PPES).

Authors:  Mei-Yu Yeh; Sieh-Hwa Lin; Tao-Hsin Tung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Do Perceptions of Empowerment Affect Glycemic Control and Self-Care Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes?

Authors:  Melba Sheila D'Souza; Subrahmanya Nairy Karkada; Nancy P Hanrahan; Ramesh Venkatesaperumal; Anandhi Amirtharaj
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-02-24

10.  Identification, description and appraisal of generic PROMs for primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mairead Murphy; Sandra Hollinghurst; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.