Literature DB >> 19557844

Contrast-enhanced MRI of carotid atherosclerosis: dependence on contrast agent.

William S Kerwin1, Xihai Zhao, Chun Yuan, Thomas S Hatsukami, Kenneth R Maravilla, Hunter R Underhill, Xueqiao Zhao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the dependence of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque on the use of gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadodiamide.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen subjects with carotid atherosclerotic plaque were imaged with 0.1 mmol/kg of each agent. For arteries with interpretable images, the areas of the lumen, wall, and necrotic core and overlying fibrous cap (when present) were measured, as were the percent enhancement and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). A kinetic model was applied to dynamic imaging results to determine the fractional plasma volume, v(p), and contrast agent transfer constant, K(trans).
RESULTS: For 12 subjects with interpretable images, the agent used did not significantly impact any area measurements or the presence or absence of necrotic core (P > 0.1 for all). However, the percent enhancement was greater for the fibrous cap (72% vs. 54%; P < 0.05) necrotic core (51% vs. 42%; P = 0.12), and lumen (42% vs. 63%; P < 0.05) when using gadobenate dimeglumine, although no apparent difference in CNR was found. Additionally, K(trans) was lower when using gadobenate dimeglumine (0.0846 min(-1) vs. 0.101 min(-1); P < 0.01), although v(p) showed no difference (9.5% vs. 10.1%; P = 0.39).
CONCLUSION: Plaque morphology measurements are similar with either contrast agent, but quantitative enhancement characteristics, such as percent enhancement and K(trans), differ. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19557844      PMCID: PMC2757078          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  26 in total

1.  T1-insensitive flow suppression using quadruple inversion-recovery.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Lipid lowering by simvastatin induces regression of human atherosclerotic lesions: two years' follow-up by high-resolution noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roberto Corti; Valentin Fuster; Zahi A Fayad; Stephen G Worthley; Gerard Helft; Donald Smith; Jesse Weinberger; Jolanda Wentzel; Gabor Mizsei; Michele Mercuri; Juan J Badimon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI.

Authors:  T Saam; M S Ferguson; V L Yarnykh; N Takaya; D Xu; N L Polissar; T S Hatsukami; C Yuan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Wash-in kinetics for gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atheroma.

Authors:  Bruce A Wasserman; Suzette G Casal; Brad C Astor; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Surface coil phased arrays for high-resolution imaging of the carotid arteries.

Authors:  C E Hayes; C M Mathis; C Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Carotid plaque composition differs between ethno-racial groups: an MRI pilot study comparing mainland Chinese and American Caucasian patients.

Authors:  T Saam; J M Cai; Y Q Cai; N Y An; A Kampschulte; D Xu; W S Kerwin; N Takaya; N L Polissar; T S Hatsukami; C Yuan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  Contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI for atherosclerotic carotid artery tissue characterization.

Authors:  Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Nayak Polissar; Shaoxiong Zhang; Jianming Cai; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Angiogenesis and the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: an association between symptomatology and plaque morphology.

Authors:  M J McCarthy; I M Loftus; M M Thompson; L Jones; N J London; P R Bell; A R Naylor; N P Brindle
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging initial results.

Authors:  Bruce A Wasserman; William I Smith; Hugh H Trout; Richard O Cannon; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  William Kerwin; Andrew Hooker; Mary Spilker; Paolo Vicini; Marina Ferguson; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  10 in total

1.  Atherosclerotic plaque inflammation quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Authors:  Huijun Chen; Tingting Wu; William S Kerwin; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  MR and Targeted Molecular MRI of Vulnerable Plaques.

Authors:  Jiping Yang; Haiqing Yang; Liqing Cao; Shujun Li
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-09

Review 3.  MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Masako Nagayama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Sarayu Ramachandran; Antoine Millon; Philip M Robson; Venkatesh Mani; Zahi Fayad
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2012-10-14

5.  Three-dimensional dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the carotid artery with direct arterial input function measurement.

Authors:  Jason Mendes; Dennis L Parker; Scott McNally; Ed DiBella; Bradley D Bolster; Gerald S Treiman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Inflammation and neovascularization intertwined in atherosclerosis: imaging of structural and molecular imaging targets.

Authors:  Umar Sadat; Farouc A Jaffer; Marc A M J van Zandvoort; Stephen J Nicholls; Domenico Ribatti; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature.

Authors:  Raf H M van Hoof; Sylvia Heeneman; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Microvasculature and intraplaque hemorrhage in atherosclerotic carotid lesions: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Geneviève A J C Crombag; Floris H B M Schreuder; Raf H M van Hoof; Martine T B Truijman; Nicky J A Wijnen; Stefan A Vöö; Patty J Nelemans; Sylvia Heeneman; Paul J Nederkoorn; Jan-Willem H Daemen; Mat J A P Daemen; Werner H Mess; J E Wildberger; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Characterization of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis using high-resolution MRI study--rationale and design.

Authors:  Tanya N Turan; Todd LeMatty; Renee Martin; Marc I Chimowitz; Zoran Rumboldt; M Vittoria Spampinato; Seth Stalcup; Robert J Adams; Truman Brown
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 10.  Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging.

Authors:  Maaz Bj Syed; Alexander J Fletcher; Rachael O Forsythe; Jakub Kaczynski; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck; Edwin Jr van Beek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.