BACKGROUND: The disease status of regional lymph nodes is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was developed as a technique to surgically assess the regional lymph nodes and spare node-negative patients unnecessary and potentially morbid complete lymphadenectomies. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on SLNB for cutaneous melanoma to provide insight into the rationale for the current widespread use of SLNB. RESULTS: Multiple studies show that the status of the SLN is an important prognostic indicator. Those with positive SLNs have significantly decreased disease-free and melanoma-specific survival compared with those who have negative SLNs. In the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial I (MSLT-I), in which patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma were randomized to SLNB (and immediate completion lymphadenectomy if the SLN was positive) vs observation (and a lymphadenectomy only after presenting with clinically evident recurrence), the 5-year survival rate was 72.3% for patients with positive sentinel nodes and 90.2% for those with negative sentinel nodes (P < .001). Although overall survival was not increased in patients who underwent SLNB compared with those who were randomized to observation, patients who underwent SLNB had a significantly increased 5-year disease-free survival rate compared with those who underwent observation alone (78.3% in the biopsy group and 73.1% in the observation group; P = .009). For those with nodal metastases, patients who underwent SLNB and immediate lymphadenectomy had an increased overall 5-year survival rate compared with those who had lymphadenectomy only after presenting with clinically evident disease (72.3% vs 52.4%; P = .004). Moreover, other studies show that for patients with thin melanomas <or= 1.0 mm, the overall survival rate is significantly worse for those with positive SLNs compared to those with negative SLNs. For thin melanomas, Breslow depth >or= 0.76 mm and increased mitotic rate have been shown to be associated with an increased incidence of SLN metastases. CONCLUSIONS:SLNB provides important prognostic and staging data with minimal morbidity and can be used to identify regional node-negative patients who would not benefit from a complete nodal dissection. In our opinion, SLNB should be performed on most patients (with acceptable surgical and anesthesia risk) who have melanomas with a Breslow depth >or= 0.76 mm.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The disease status of regional lymph nodes is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was developed as a technique to surgically assess the regional lymph nodes and spare node-negative patients unnecessary and potentially morbid complete lymphadenectomies. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on SLNB for cutaneous melanoma to provide insight into the rationale for the current widespread use of SLNB. RESULTS: Multiple studies show that the status of the SLN is an important prognostic indicator. Those with positive SLNs have significantly decreased disease-free and melanoma-specific survival compared with those who have negative SLNs. In the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial I (MSLT-I), in which patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma were randomized to SLNB (and immediate completion lymphadenectomy if the SLN was positive) vs observation (and a lymphadenectomy only after presenting with clinically evident recurrence), the 5-year survival rate was 72.3% for patients with positive sentinel nodes and 90.2% for those with negative sentinel nodes (P < .001). Although overall survival was not increased in patients who underwent SLNB compared with those who were randomized to observation, patients who underwent SLNB had a significantly increased 5-year disease-free survival rate compared with those who underwent observation alone (78.3% in the biopsy group and 73.1% in the observation group; P = .009). For those with nodal metastases, patients who underwent SLNB and immediate lymphadenectomy had an increased overall 5-year survival rate compared with those who had lymphadenectomy only after presenting with clinically evident disease (72.3% vs 52.4%; P = .004). Moreover, other studies show that for patients with thin melanomas <or= 1.0 mm, the overall survival rate is significantly worse for those with positive SLNs compared to those with negative SLNs. For thin melanomas, Breslow depth >or= 0.76 mm and increased mitotic rate have been shown to be associated with an increased incidence of SLN metastases. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB provides important prognostic and staging data with minimal morbidity and can be used to identify regional node-negative patients who would not benefit from a complete nodal dissection. In our opinion, SLNB should be performed on most patients (with acceptable surgical and anesthesia risk) who have melanomas with a Breslow depth >or= 0.76 mm.
Authors: Nathan Andrew Rohner; Jacob McClain; Sara Lydia Tuell; Alex Warner; Blair Smith; Youngho Yun; Abhinav Mohan; Manuela Sushnitha; Susan Napier Thomas Journal: FASEB J Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sumeet Thareja; Jonathan S Zager; Divya Sadhwani; Shalini Thareja; Ren Chen; Suroosh Marzban; Drazen M Jukic; Lewis F Glass; Jane Messina Journal: Am J Dermatopathol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Walter J Akers; Chulhong Kim; Mikhail Berezin; Kevin Guo; Ralph Fuhrhop; Gregory M Lanza; Georg M Fischer; Ewald Daltrozzo; Andreas Zumbusch; Xin Cai; Lihong V Wang; Samuel Achilefu Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Christy Y Chai; Jonathan S Zager; Margaret M Szabunio; Suroosh S Marzban; Alec Chau; Robert M Rossi; Vernon K Sondak Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Vyomesh Patel; Daniel Martin; Ruchika Malhotra; Christina A Marsh; Colleen L Doçi; Timothy D Veenstra; Cherie-Ann O Nathan; Uttam K Sinha; Bhuvanesh Singh; Alfredo A Molinolo; James F Rusling; J Silvio Gutkind Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2012-09-23 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Brian S Chu; Wima Koffi; Richard S Hoehn; Audrey Ertel; Shimul A Shah; Syed A Ahmad; Jeffrey J Sussman; Heather B Neuman; Daniel E Abbott Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Dale Han; Daohai Yu; Xiuhua Zhao; Suroosh S Marzban; Jane L Messina; Ricardo J Gonzalez; C Wayne Cruse; Amod A Sarnaik; Christopher Puleo; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Dale Han; Jonathan S Zager; Gang Han; Suroosh S Marzban; Christopher A Puleo; Amod A Sarnaik; Damon Reed; Jane L Messina; Vernon K Sondak Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 5.344