BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reproducibility in identifying the fibrous cap (FC) of carotid artery plaques by noncontrast-enhanced MRI has been shown to be poor. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of multisequence MRI, including contrast-enhanced images, in assessing FC status. METHODS: Forty-five symptomatic patients with 30% to 69% carotid artery stenosis underwent a multisequence MRI protocol, which included contrast-enhanced images. FC status (ie, discrimination between fibrotic and/or calcified plaques, plaques with a lipid-rich necrotic core and an intact and thick FC, and plaques with a lipid-rich necrotic core and a thin and/or ruptured FC) was independently assessed by 3 observers of which one also scored all images on a different occasion. Linear weighted kappa coefficients (kappa) were calculated as indicators of inter- and intraobserver agreement. RESULTS: On a per-slice basis, interobserver agreement was good (kappa=0.60, 0.64, and 0.71), whereas intraobserver agreement was very good (kappa=0.86). On a per-plaque basis, interobserver agreement was good (kappa=0.64, 0.69, and 0.78), whereas intraobserver agreement was very good (kappa=0.96). CONCLUSIONS: This study found good interobserver and very good intraobserver agreement in assessing FC status of carotid artery plaques. Future studies are warranted to determine the predictive value of FC status assessment by multisequence MRI, including contrast-enhanced images, on the occurrence of (recurrent) cerebral ischemic events.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reproducibility in identifying the fibrous cap (FC) of carotid artery plaques by noncontrast-enhanced MRI has been shown to be poor. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of multisequence MRI, including contrast-enhanced images, in assessing FC status. METHODS: Forty-five symptomatic patients with 30% to 69% carotid artery stenosis underwent a multisequence MRI protocol, which included contrast-enhanced images. FC status (ie, discrimination between fibrotic and/or calcified plaques, plaques with a lipid-rich necrotic core and an intact and thick FC, and plaques with a lipid-rich necrotic core and a thin and/or ruptured FC) was independently assessed by 3 observers of which one also scored all images on a different occasion. Linear weighted kappa coefficients (kappa) were calculated as indicators of inter- and intraobserver agreement. RESULTS: On a per-slice basis, interobserver agreement was good (kappa=0.60, 0.64, and 0.71), whereas intraobserver agreement was very good (kappa=0.86). On a per-plaque basis, interobserver agreement was good (kappa=0.64, 0.69, and 0.78), whereas intraobserver agreement was very good (kappa=0.96). CONCLUSIONS: This study found good interobserver and very good intraobserver agreement in assessing FC status of carotid artery plaques. Future studies are warranted to determine the predictive value of FC status assessment by multisequence MRI, including contrast-enhanced images, on the occurrence of (recurrent) cerebral ischemic events.
Authors: G A J C Crombag; M Aizaz; F H B M Schreuder; F Benali; D H K van Dam-Nolen; M I Liem; C Lucci; A F van der Steen; M J A P Daemen; W H Mess; A van der Lugt; P J Nederkoorn; J Hendrikse; P A M Hofman; R J van Oostenbrugge; J E Wildberger; M E Kooi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Harm A Nieuwstadt; Aad van der Lugt; Zaid A M Kassar; Marcel Breeuwer; Anton F W van der Steen; Frank J H Gijsen Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2014-08
Authors: Seong-Eun Kim; John A Roberts; Laura B Eisenmenger; Booth W Aldred; Osama Jamil; Bradley D Bolster; Xiaoming Bi; Dennis L Parker; Gerald S Treiman; J Scott McNally Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Robert M Kwee; Paul A M Hofman; Ed H B M Gronenschild; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Johannes W M ter Berg; Cees L Franke; Arthur G G C Korten; Bé J Meems; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Diederik F van Wijk; Aart C Strang; Raphael Duivenvoorden; Dirk-Jan F Enklaar; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Rob J van der Geest; John J P Kastelein; Eric de Groot; Erik S G Stroes; Aart J Nederveen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Li Dong; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Rui Li; Jinnan Wang; Huijun Chen; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: K Dilba; D H K van Dam-Nolen; A C van Dijk; M Kassem; A F W van der Steen; P J Koudstaal; P J Nederkoorn; J Hendrikse; M E Kooi; J J Wentzel; A van der Lugt Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert M Kwee; Martine T B Truijman; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Martin H Prins; Cees L Franke; Arthur G G C Korten; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240