Andrea Frustaci1, Matteo A Russo, Cristina Chimenti. 1. Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Department, La Sapienza University, Viale del Policlinico 155, Rome 00161, Italy. biocard@inmi.it
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppression in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 85 patients with myocarditis and chronic (>6 months) heart failure unresponsive to conventional therapy, with no evidence of myocardial viral genomes. Patients received either prednisone 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 4 weeks followed by 0.33 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 5 months and azathioprine 2 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 6 months (43 patients, Group 1) or placebo (42 patients, Group 2) in addition to conventional therapy for heart failure. Primary outcome was the 6 month improvement in left-ventricular function. Group 1 showed a significant improvement of left-ventricular ejection fraction and a significant decrease in left-ventricular dimensions and volumes compared with baseline. None of Group 2 patients showed improvement of ejection fraction, that significantly worsened compared with baseline. No major adverse reaction was registered as a result of immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the efficacy of immunosuppression in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Lack of response in 12% of cases suggests the presence of not screened viruses or mechanisms of damage and inflammation not susceptible to immunosuppression.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppression in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 85 patients with myocarditis and chronic (>6 months) heart failure unresponsive to conventional therapy, with no evidence of myocardial viral genomes. Patients received either prednisone 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 4 weeks followed by 0.33 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 5 months and azathioprine 2 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 6 months (43 patients, Group 1) or placebo (42 patients, Group 2) in addition to conventional therapy for heart failure. Primary outcome was the 6 month improvement in left-ventricular function. Group 1 showed a significant improvement of left-ventricular ejection fraction and a significant decrease in left-ventricular dimensions and volumes compared with baseline. None of Group 2 patients showed improvement of ejection fraction, that significantly worsened compared with baseline. No major adverse reaction was registered as a result of immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the efficacy of immunosuppression in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Lack of response in 12% of cases suggests the presence of not screened viruses or mechanisms of damage and inflammation not susceptible to immunosuppression.
Authors: Julian G Westphal; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Constantinos Bakogiannis; Sarah E Ludwig; Sophie Mavrogeni; Boris Bigalke; Torsten Doenst; Matthias Pauschinger; Carsten Tschöpe; P Christian Schulze; Michel Noutsias Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.214