Woody-to-total area ratio determination with a multispectral canopy imager.

Leaf area index (LAI) - defined as one half of the total green leaf area per unit ground surface area - can be determined by direct or indirect methods. Three major sources of errors exist in indirect LAI measurements: within-shoot clumping, beyond-shoot clumping and non-photosynthetic components. The effect of non-photosynthetic components on LAI measurements can be described by the woody-to-total area ratio, alpha; however, no convenient and efficient indirect methods have been developed to estimate alpha, especially the variations in alpha with zenith angle , alpha(theta). We describe the development and use of a multispectral canopy imager (MCI) to estimate alpha and alpha(theta) by considering the effects of non-random distributions of canopy elements and woody components and the overestimation of needle-to-shoot area ratio on woody components. The MCI, which mainly comprises a near-infrared band camera (Fujifilm IS-1), two visible band cameras (Canon 40D), filters and a pan tilt, was developed to measure clumping index, woody-to-total area ratio and geometric parameters of isolated trees. Two typical sampling plots (Plots 1 and 5) chosen from among 16 permanent forest experiment plots were selected for the estimation of alpha and alpha(theta). The non-random distributions of canopy elements and woody components were estimated separately at eight zenith angles (from 0 degrees to 70 degrees in increments of 10 degrees) using MCI images based on the gap size distribution theory. The visible/near-infrared image pairs captured by the MCI were able to discriminate among sky, leaves, cloud and woody components. Based on three methods of estimation, we obtained woody-to-total area ratios of 0.24, 0.19, 0.19 for Plot 1 and 0.23, 0.18, 0.17 for Plot 5. If clumping effects were ignored, alpha values were overestimated by as much as 21% and 24% at Plots 1 and 5, respectively. We demonstrated that alpha(theta) varied with the zenith angle, with variations in the range of 3-33% at Plot 1 and 2-65% at Plot 5. A new formula for the precise determination of LAI is proposed.