Literature DB >> 1955603

Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: implications for reports of child sexual abuse.

K J Saywitz1, G S Goodman, E Nicholas, S F Moan.   

Abstract

Evaluation of child sexual abuse often necessitates interviewing children about genital touch, yet little scientific research exists on how best to obtain children's reports of genital contact. To examine this issue, 72 five- and seven-year-old girls experienced a standardized medical checkup. For half of the children, the checkup included a vaginal and anal examination (genital condition); for the other half, the checkup included a scoliosis examination instead (nongenital condition). The children's memories were later solicited through free recall, anatomically detailed doll demonstration, and direct and misleading questions. The majority of children in the genital condition revealed vaginal and anal contact only when asked directly about it. Children in the nongenital condition never falsely reported genital touch in free recall or doll demonstration; when asked directly, the false report rate was low. Significant age differences in free recall and doll demonstration, found only in the nongenital condition, implicated socioemotional factors as suppressing the reports of older children who experienced genital contact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1955603     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.5.682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  14 in total

Review 1.  Interviewing children versus tossing coins: accurately assessing the diagnosticity of children's disclosures of abuse.

Authors:  Thomas D Lyon; Elizabeth C Ahern; Nicholas Scurich
Journal:  J Child Sex Abus       Date:  2012

2.  "How did you feel?": increasing child sexual abuse witnesses' production of evaluative information.

Authors:  Thomas D Lyon; Nicholas Scurich; Karen Choi; Sally Handmaker; Rebecca Blank
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Forensic Interviewing Aids: Do Props Help Children Answer Questions About Touching?

Authors:  Debra Ann Poole; Maggie Bruck; Margaret-Ellen Pipe
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-01

4.  Repeated questions, deception, and children's true and false reports of body touch.

Authors:  Jodi A Quas; Elizabeth L Davis; Gail S Goodman; John E B Myers
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2007-02

5.  Divining Testimony? The Impact of Interviewing Props on Children's Reports of Touching.

Authors:  Debra Ann Poole; Maggie Bruck
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2012-07-03

6.  Human figure drawings and children's recall of touching.

Authors:  Maggie Bruck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-12

7.  Detecting children's true and false denials of wrongdoing: Effects of question type and base rate knowledge.

Authors:  Kirsten Domagalski; Jennifer Gongola; Thomas D Lyon; Steven E Clark; Jodi A Quas
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2020-11-25

8.  Do human figure diagrams help alleged victims of sexual abuse provide elaborate and clear accounts of physical contact with alleged perpetrators?

Authors:  Yee-San Teoh; Pei-Jung Yang; Michael E Lamb; Anneli S Larsson
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01

Review 9.  Children's testimony: a review of research on memory for past experiences.

Authors:  B N Gordon; L Baker-Ward; P A Ornstein
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-06

10.  Implicit Encouragement: Enhancing Youth Productivity when Recounting a Stressful Experience.

Authors:  Jodi A Quas; Kelli L Dickerson
Journal:  Int J Child Maltreat       Date:  2019-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.