Literature DB >> 19555614

Comparison of initial antibiotic choice and treatment of cellulitis in the pre- and post-community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus eras.

Ryan D Wells1, Phillip Mason, Joseph Roarty, Melissa Dooley.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Treatment success of cellulitis in the age of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CAMRSA). A comparison of initial antibiotic choice and treatment success in the pre- and post-CAMRSA eras.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine antibiotic prescribing patterns and treatment failure rates for cellulitis in the pre- and post-CAMRSA eras.
METHODS: We performed an electronic chart review of patients seen in our emergency department with cellulitis in 2000 and 2005. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years or more and received a single oral antibiotic for cellulitis. Exclusion criteria were incision and drainage, surgery, or admission on initial visit. Treatment failure was defined as a repeat visit in the subsequent 30 days and a change in antibiotics, admission to the hospital, incision and drainage of abscess, or surgical intervention. Antibiotic-prescribing practices and treatment failure rates were then compared in the pre- and post-CAMRSA eras.
RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in beta-lactam antibiotics and an increase in CAMRSA-effective antibiotics prescribed in 2005 vs 2000. The difference in treatment failure rates of the beta-lactams and CAMRSA antibiotics was statistically insignificant. There has not been an increase in failure rates of the beta-lactam antibiotics for simple cellulitis since the emergence of CAMRSA.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that prescribing practices for simple cellulitis have changed since the emergence of CAMRSA. This may not be appropriate because beta-lactam antibiotics perform as well as 'CAMRSA antibiotics' in our study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19555614     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

1.  Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Krishan Yadav; Avik Nath; Kathryn N Suh; Lindsey Sikora; Debra Eagles
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  PCR offers no advantage over culture for microbiologic diagnosis in cellulitis.

Authors:  K E Johnson; D E Kiyatkin; A T An; S Riedel; J Melendez; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Avoidable antibiotic exposure for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections in the ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  Hermione J Hurley; Bryan C Knepper; Connie S Price; Philip S Mehler; William J Burman; Timothy C Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Cellulitis in adult patients: A large, multicenter, observational, prospective study of 606 episodes and analysis of the factors related to the response to treatment.

Authors:  Julio Collazos; Belén de la Fuente; Alicia García; Helena Gómez; C Menéndez; Héctor Enríquez; Paula Sánchez; María Alonso; Ian López-Cruz; Manuel Martín-Regidor; Ana Martínez-Alonso; José Guerra; Arturo Artero; Marino Blanes; Javier de la Fuente; Víctor Asensi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.