Literature DB >> 19554856

Whose best interests? Advance directives and clinical discretion.

Grant Gillett1.   

Abstract

A patient's advance directive (AD), confronts a clinician with a quasi-legal document of uncertain status in different jurisdictions and therefore a challenge to her or his clinical acumen and skill. The permutations of factors that need to be taken into account in the resulting clinical decision can be quite confusing. The uncertainties that arise in relation to the provision or otherwise of various forms of invasive and possibly risky clinical treatment can be very disconcerting in that the clinician may be aware of the need to account for the appropriateness of judgments about life-saving treatment and not just the clinical competence that was exhibited. The clinician needs to be clear about the relationships between the duty of care, reasonable medical practice, consent, and what would be considered a substantial benefit or unacceptable risk to the patient. This column outline a decision structure that treats reasonable practice and the patient's wishes as combining to determine whether or not clinical interventions should proceed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19554856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med        ISSN: 1320-159X


  1 in total

1.  Stroke and Craniectomy.

Authors:  Eelco F M Wijdicks
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.210

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.