Literature DB >> 19553031

Whole-pelvis radiotherapy in combination with interstitial brachytherapy: does coverage of the pelvic lymph nodes improve treatment outcome in high-risk prostate cancer?

Nathan Bittner1, Gregory S Merrick, Kent E Wallner, Wayne M Butler, Robert Galbreath, Edward Adamovich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates among high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy and supplemental external beam radiation (EBRT) using either a mini-pelvis (MP) or a whole-pelvis (WP) field. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 1995 to October 2005, 186 high-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with brachytherapy and EBRT with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). High-risk prostate cancer was defined as a Gleason score of > or =8 and/or a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of > or =20 ng/ml.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, the 10-year bPFS, CSS, and OS rates for the WP vs. the MP arms were 91.7% vs. 84.4% (p = 0.126), 95.5% vs. 92.6% (p = 0.515), and 79.5% vs. 67.1% (p = 0.721), respectively. Among those patients who received ADT, the 10-year bPFS, CSS, and OS rates for the WP vs. the MP arms were 93.6% vs. 90.1% (p = 0.413), 94.2% vs. 96.0% (p = 0.927), and 73.7% vs. 70.2% (p = 0.030), respectively. Among those patients who did not receive ADT, the 10-year bPFS, CSS, and OS rates for the WP vs. the MP arms were 82.4% vs. 75.0% (p = 0.639), 100% vs. 88% (p = 0.198), and 87.5% vs. 58.8% (p = 0.030), respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, none of the evaluated parameters predicted for CSS, while bPFS was best predicted by ADT and percent positive biopsy results. OS was best predicted by age and percent positive biopsy results.
CONCLUSIONS: For high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving brachytherapy, there is a nonsignificant trend toward improved bPFS, CSS, and OS rates when brachytherapy is given with WPRT. This trend is most apparent among ADT-naïve patients, for whom a significant improvement in OS was observed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19553031     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS).

Authors:  Shiro Saito; Kazuto Ito; Atsunori Yorozu; Manabu Aoki; Hirofumi Koga; Takefumi Satoh; Toshio Ohashi; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Shinichiro Maruo; Takashi Kikuchi; Shinsuke Kojima; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Use of androgen deprivation therapy with prostate brachytherapy-A systematic literature review.

Authors:  M Keyes; G Merrick; S J Frank; P Grimm; M J Zelefsky
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Prostate-only Versus Whole-pelvis Radiation with or Without a Brachytherapy Boost for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Kiri A Sandler; Ryan R Cook; Jay P Ciezki; Ashley E Ross; Mark M Pomerantz; Paul L Nguyen; Talha Shaikh; Phuoc T Tran; Richard G Stock; Gregory S Merrick; David Jeffrey Demanes; Daniel E Spratt; Eyad I Abu-Isa; Trude B Wedde; Wolfgang Lilleby; Daniel J Krauss; Grace K Shaw; Ridwan Alam; Chandana A Reddy; Daniel Y Song; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson; Jeffrey J Tosoian; John V Hegde; Sun Mi Yoo; Ryan Fiano; Anthony V D'Amico; Nicholas G Nickols; William J Aronson; Ahmad Sadeghi; Stephen C Greco; Curtiland Deville; Todd McNutt; Theodore L DeWeese; Robert E Reiter; Jonathan W Said; Michael L Steinberg; Eric M Horwitz; Patrick A Kupelian; Christopher R King; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Update on prostate brachytherapy: long-term outcomes and treatment-related morbidity.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Jamie A Cesaretti; Nelson N Stone; Richard G Stock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Low rate of lymphedema after extended pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by pelvic irradiation of node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elisabeth Rasmusson; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; René Blom; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Per Nilsson; Göran Ahlgen; Charlotta Jönsson; Karin Johansson; Elisabeth Kjellén
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Efficacy and Toxicity of Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy Versus Prostate-Only Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shilin Wang; Wen Tang; Huanli Luo; Fu Jin; Ying Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Prostate-specific antigen nadir after high-dose-rate brachytherapy predicts long-term survival outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hideyasu Tsumura; Takefumi Satoh; Hiromichi Ishiyama; Ken-Ichi Tabata; Shouko Komori; Akane Sekiguchi; Masaomi Ikeda; Shinji Kurosaka; Tetsuo Fujita; Masashi Kitano; Kazushige Hayakawa; Masatsugu Iwamura
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-04-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.