Literature DB >> 19553021

Does "off-hours" admission affect burn patient outcome?

Breena R Taira1, Hongdao Meng, Melody S Goodman, Adam J Singer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous critical care and cardiology studies find that critically ill patients have worse outcomes when admitted to the hospital during off-hours as compared to those admitted during weekdays. As severe burn is equally emergent we hypothesized that this disparity in outcomes would exist for burn patients as well. STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) version 7.1. The NTDB is a national registry of hospital admissions for traumatic injury administered by the American College of Surgeons.
SETTING: 700 trauma facilities nationwide contributing to the NTDB between 2002 and 2006.
SUBJECTS: All trauma patients included in the dataset with the injury mechanism of burn divided into "off-hours" admits (nights from 6pm to 6am and weekends) and weekday admits. MEASURES: Time and day of admission, demographics, ISS score, injury characteristics (+/-inhalational injury, TBSA, and full thickness injury), facility characteristics (number of burn beds, teaching status). OUTCOMES: Mortality as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital length of stay. DATA ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics to summarize group characteristics, chi(2) and Student's t tests for bivariate analysis, multivariable linear and logistic regressions.
RESULTS: Of the 25,572 burn patients, 17,625 (68.9%) arrived during off-hours. There was no difference in ICU length of stay (LOS) (p=0.233), hospital LOS (p=0.82), or mortality (p=0.546) for those admitted during off-hours compared with weekday admits. In multivariate analysis when controlling for age, gender, burn characteristics (inhalation injury, full thickness injury, and TBSA >30%), and hospital type, off-hours admission was not predictive of mortality (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.91-1.23).
CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to studies in other critically ill patient populations, off-hours admission is not predictive of worse outcomes in burn patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19553021     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  Time from accident to admission to a burn intensive care unit: how long does it actually take? A 25-year retrospective data analysis from a german burn center.

Authors:  J L Schiefer; A Alischahi; W Perbix; D Grigutsch; I Graeff; M Zinser; E Demir; P C Fuchs; A Schulz
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 2.  Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact?

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Taimur Saleem; Jeffrey J Leow; Cassandra V Villegas; Mehreen Kisat; Eric B Schneider; Elliott R Haut; Kent A Stevens; Edward E Cornwell; Ellen J MacKenzie; David T Efron
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Twenty-four/seven: a mixed-method systematic review of the off-shift literature.

Authors:  Pamela B de Cordova; Ciaran S Phibbs; Ann P Bartel; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Prognostic impact of the time of admission and discharge from the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Héctor Eduardo Moreira; Federico Verga; Marcelo Barbato; Gastón Burghi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  Massive Burns: Retrospective Analysis of Changes in Outcomes Indicators Across 18 Years.

Authors:  Joachim N Meuli; Olivier Pantet; Mette M Berger; Laurent Waselle; Wassim Raffoul
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.845

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.