Literature DB >> 19552935

Robotic surgical telepathology between the Iron Mountain and Milwaukee Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: a 12-year experience.

Bruce E Dunn1, Hongyung Choi, Daniel L Recla, Sarah E Kerr, Benjamin L Wagenman.   

Abstract

Since mid-1996, we have operated a diagnostic robotic telepathology (TP) system at the Iron Mountain, MI, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) from the Milwaukee, WI, VAMC, located some 220 miles away. No on-site pathologist is present in Iron Mountain. Instead, an experienced, well-trained pathologist assistant, under direction of pathologists located in Milwaukee, is responsible for tissue grossing and sectioning. The pathologist assistant places slides onto the stage of the robotic microscope, which is then controlled by pathologists in Milwaukee. Each case read by TP is subsequently read by light microscopy (LM) by the same pathologist. Three distinct phases of TP have been recognized. Our experience during phase I (mid-1996 to early 1999) has been published previously. During phase II (early 1999 to mid-2004), 1 of the 2 senior telepathologists in phase I retired, and 3 junior pathologists were hired. During phase III (mid-2004 to June 2008), 2 new junior pathologists were hired, and ASAP Imaging (Apollo Telemedicine, Inc., Falls Church, VA) was implemented. The number of TP case opportunities in phases I, II, and III was 2200, 5841, and 3512, respectively, resulting in a total of 11 553. A total of 1834 cases were deferred to LM for a variety of reasons. The number of TP diagnoses rendered in phases I, II, and III was 2144, 4636, and 2939, respectively, resulting in a total of 9719. The major discordance rates in phases I, II, and III were 0.33%, 0.45%, and 0.20%, respectively, with an overall rate of 0.35%. Pathologist-specific discordance rates were not significantly different and ranged from a low of 0.12% to a high of 0.77%, whereas case deferral rates were significantly different (P < .0001) and ranged from 2.5% to 28.7%. In general, no relationship between deferral rate and discordance rate was noted. Iron Mountain clinicians have expressed great satisfaction with the services provided by their off-site pathologist colleagues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19552935     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  12 in total

Review 1.  The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 2.  Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthew G Hanna; Orly Ardon; Victor E Reuter; Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun; Christine England; David S Klimstra; Meera R Hameed
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  The effects of a regional telepathology project: a study protocol.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Trudel; Guy Paré; Bernard Têtu; Claude Sicotte
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Use of mobile high-resolution device for remote frozen section evaluation of whole slide images.

Authors:  Joel Ramey; Kar Ming Fung; Lewis A Hassell
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-08-27

5.  Evaluating whole slide imaging: A working group opportunity.

Authors:  Darren Treanor; Brandon D Gallas; Marios A Gavrielides; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-02-24

6.  American Telemedicine Association clinical guidelines for telepathology.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; Kim Dickinson; Andrew J Evans; Lewis A Hassell; Walter H Henricks; Jochen K Lennerz; Amanda Lowe; Anil V Parwani; Michael Riben; Col Daniel Smith; J Mark Tuthill; Ronald S Weinstein; David C Wilbur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jordana Bernard
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2014-10-21

7.  Subspecialty surgical pathologist's performances as triage pathologists on a telepathology-enabled quality assurance surgical pathology service: A human factors study.

Authors:  Beth L Braunhut; Anna R Graham; Fangru Lian; Phyllis D Webster; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Achyut K Bhattacharyya; Ronald S Weinstein
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2014-05-26

8.  Utility of telepathology as a consultation tool between an off-site surgical pathology suite and affiliated hospitals in the frozen section diagnosis of lung neoplasms.

Authors:  Taisia Vitkovski; Tawfiqul Bhuiya; Michael Esposito
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-10-28

9.  Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: An Active Quality Assessment and Experience of Over 400 Cases.

Authors:  Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun; Dorota Rudomina; Allix Mazzella; Rusmir Feratovic; William Alago; Robert Siegelbaum; Oscar Lin
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-09-07

10.  Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints.

Authors:  Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun; Dorota Rudomina; Allix Mazzella; Rusmir Feratovic; William Alago; Robert Siegelbaum; Oscar Lin
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.