AIMS: The aim was to compare possible effects of verapamil, as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of each fexofenadine enantiomer, as a P-gp substrate. METHODS:Thirteen healthy Japanese volunteers (10 male and three female) were enrolled. In a randomized, two-phase, crossover design, verapamil was dosed 80 mg three times daily (with total daily doses of 240 mg) for 6 days, and on day 6, a single 120-mg dose of fexofenadine was administered along with an 80-mg dose of verapamil. Subsequently, fexofenadine was administered alone after a 2-week wash-out period. The plasma concentrations of fexofenadine enantiomers were measured up to 24 h after dosing. RESULTS: During the control phase, the mean AUC(0-infinity) of S(-)- and R(+)-fexofenadine was 700 ng h(-1) ml(-1)[95% confidence interval (CI) 577, 823] and 1202 ng h(-1) ml(-1) (95% CI 1007, 1396), respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). Verapamil had a greater effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of S(-)-fexofenadine compared with those of the R(+)-enantiomer, and increased AUC(0-infinity) of S(-)-fexofenadine and R(+)-fexofenadine by 3.5-fold (95% CI of differences 1.9, 5.1; P < 0.001) and by 2.2-fold (95% CI of differences 1.7, 3.0; P < 0.001), respectively. The R/S ratio for the AUC(0-infinity) was reduced from 1.76 to 1.32 (P < 0.001) by verapamil treatments. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that P-gp plays a key role in the stereoselectivity of fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, since the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine enantiomers were altered by the P-gp inhibitor verapamil, and this effect was greater for S-fexofenadine compared with R-fexofenadine.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: The aim was to compare possible effects of verapamil, as a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of each fexofenadine enantiomer, as a P-gp substrate. METHODS: Thirteen healthy Japanese volunteers (10 male and three female) were enrolled. In a randomized, two-phase, crossover design, verapamil was dosed 80 mg three times daily (with total daily doses of 240 mg) for 6 days, and on day 6, a single 120-mg dose of fexofenadine was administered along with an 80-mg dose of verapamil. Subsequently, fexofenadine was administered alone after a 2-week wash-out period. The plasma concentrations of fexofenadine enantiomers were measured up to 24 h after dosing. RESULTS: During the control phase, the mean AUC(0-infinity) of S(-)- and R(+)-fexofenadine was 700 ng h(-1) ml(-1)[95% confidence interval (CI) 577, 823] and 1202 ng h(-1) ml(-1) (95% CI 1007, 1396), respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). Verapamil had a greater effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of S(-)-fexofenadine compared with those of the R(+)-enantiomer, and increased AUC(0-infinity) of S(-)-fexofenadine and R(+)-fexofenadine by 3.5-fold (95% CI of differences 1.9, 5.1; P < 0.001) and by 2.2-fold (95% CI of differences 1.7, 3.0; P < 0.001), respectively. The R/S ratio for the AUC(0-infinity) was reduced from 1.76 to 1.32 (P < 0.001) by verapamil treatments. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that P-gp plays a key role in the stereoselectivity of fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, since the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine enantiomers were altered by the P-gp inhibitor verapamil, and this effect was greater for S-fexofenadine compared with R-fexofenadine.
Authors: George K Dresser; David G Bailey; Brenda F Leake; Ute I Schwarz; Paul A Dawson; David J Freeman; Richard B Kim Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: D Belpomme; S Gauthier; E Pujade-Lauraine; T Facchini; M J Goudier; I Krakowski; G Netter-Pinon; M Frenay; C Gousset; F N Marié; M Benmiloud; F Sturtz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Silke Conen; Eef L Theunissen; Annemiek Vermeeren; Peter van Ruitenbeek; Peter Stiers; Mitul A Mehta; Stefan W Toennes; Johannes G Ramaekers Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-04-07 Impact factor: 4.530