Literature DB >> 19552302

Three studies on the neuroeconomics of decision-making when payoffs are real and negative.

Gregory S Berns1, C Monica Capra, Sara Moore, Charles Noussair.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We summarize three previous neuroeconomic studies with two features that distinguish them from most others in experimental economics: (1) the use of physical pain to induce incentives and (2) acquisition of data on brain activation levels. By correlating behavior when payoffs are painful with brain activation, we are able to test for the neurobiological relevance of important phenomena previously observed in experimental studies that are at odds with classical economic theories of decision-making. These specific phenomena are (a) negative discounting of future payoffs; (b) nonlinear probability weighting; (c) the experience of regret and rejoice when making a decision under risk. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The expectation of pain is created through the use of mild electric shocks to the top of the foot. Pain confers disutility, so decisions are made in the domain of losses relative to the status quo. Simultaneous with these decisions, brain activation data is acquired through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
FINDINGS: We find evidence for negative time discounting of electric shocks. Participants who exhibited the most extreme forms of this discounting were distinguished by early and robust activation of a subset of the cortical pain matrix. We also find evidence for probability weighting in the domain of electric shocks, which is manifest at the neural level. We find evidence both behaviorally and neurally for regret and rejoice functions for painful outcomes. ORIGINALITY/VALUE OF CHAPTER: Previous experimental economic studies in the domain of losses have typically used monetary rewards. Here, we report behavioral effects and neural correlates using pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19552302      PMCID: PMC2892107          DOI: 10.1016/s0731-2199(08)20001-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0731-2199


  68 in total

1.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; M L Kringelbach; E T Rolls; J Hornak; C Andrews
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study.

Authors:  J Grèzes; C D Frith; R E Passingham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Brain correlates of subjective reality of physically and psychologically induced pain.

Authors:  Tuukka T Raij; Jussi Numminen; Sakari Närvänen; Jaana Hiltunen; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Mark A Pinsk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Decoding the neural substrates of reward-related decision making with functional MRI.

Authors:  Alan N Hampton; John P O'doherty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Kobayashi; Aihide Yoshino; Yoshitomo Takahashi; Soichiro Nomura
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 3.145

Review 7.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neural correlates of true and false belief reasoning.

Authors:  Monika Sommer; Katrin Döhnel; Beate Sodian; Jörg Meinhardt; Claudia Thoermer; Göran Hajak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Pain mechanisms: labeled lines versus convergence in central processing.

Authors:  A D Bud Craig
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  7 in total

1.  Walnut consumption increases activation of the insula to highly desirable food cues: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over fMRI study.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Dario Tuccinardi; Jagriti Upadhyay; Sabrina M Oussaada; Christos S Mantzoros
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.577

2.  Obese individuals with type 2 diabetes demonstrate decreased activation of the salience-related insula and increased activation of the emotion/salience-related amygdala to visual food cues compared to non-obese individuals with diabetes: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Christos S Mantzoros
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Decreased saliency processing as a neural measure of Barratt impulsivity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Sien Hu; Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Lorcaserin Administration Decreases Activation of Brain Centers in Response to Food Cues and These Emotion- and Salience-Related Changes Correlate With Weight Loss Effects: A 4-Week-Long Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Jagriti Upadhyay; Anna Gavrieli; Michelle Camp; Nikolaos Spyrou; Harper Kaye; Hannah Mathew; Maria Vamvini; Anastasia Koniaris; Holly Kilim; Alexandra Srnka; Alexandra Migdal; Christos S Mantzoros
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.

Authors:  Patrick Ring; Christian Kaernbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How costs influence decision values for mixed outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Alex Pine
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The framing effect and skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Patrick Ring
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.