Literature DB >> 19551510

Role of upper airway dimensions in snore production: acoustical and perceptual findings.

Andrew Keong Ng1, Tong San Koh, Eugene Baey, Kathiravelu Puvanendran.   

Abstract

While considerable efforts have been expended to develop snore-driven markers for detecting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there is little emphasis on the relationship between the human upper airway (UA) dimensions and the attributes of snores. This paper aims to investigate the acoustical and perceptual impacts of changing the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the pharynx and oral cavity on the production of snores. Synthetic snores were generated based on the source-filter theory, whereas natural snores were recorded from 40 snorers during nocturnal polysomnography. First formant frequency (F1), spectral peak frequency (PF), and psychoacoustic metrics (loudness, sharpness, roughness, fluctuation strength, and annoyance) of CSA perturbations were examined, completed with diagnostic appraisal of F1 and PF for single- and mixed-gender groupings using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results show that (1) narrowing the pharyngeal airway consistently increases F1, but not for PF; and (2) altering the airway dimensions yield no considerable differences in perception of snore sounds, but indirectly affect the psychoacoustics by changing the dynamics of snore source flow. Diagnostic outcomes for all groupings (p-value < 0.0001) demonstrate that F1 is more capable of distinguishing apneic and benign snorers than PF due to the close association of F1 with the UA anatomical structures. Correlation exists between the UA anatomy and the properties of snores; there is a promising future for developing snore-driven screening tools for OSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19551510     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9745-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  7 in total

1.  Distinguishing snoring sounds from breath sounds: a straightforward matter?

Authors:  Christian Rohrmeier; Michael Herzog; Tobias Ettl; Thomas S Kuehnel
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Effects of Increased Pharyngeal Tissue Mass Due to Fluid Accumulation in the Neck on the Acoustic Features of Snoring Sounds in Men.

Authors:  Shumit Saha; Zahra Moussavi; Peyman Hadi; T Douglas Bradley; Azadeh Yadollahi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Intra-subject variability of snoring sounds in relation to body position, sleep stage, and blood oxygen level.

Authors:  Ali Azarbarzin; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Calculating annoyance: an option to proof efficacy in ENT treatment of snoring?

Authors:  René Fischer; Thomas S Kuehnel; Anne-Kathrin Merz; Tobias Ettl; Michael Herzog; Christian Rohrmeier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Compliance Measurements of the Upper Airway in Pediatric Down Syndrome Sleep Apnea Patients.

Authors:  Dhananjay Radhakrishnan Subramaniam; Goutham Mylavarapu; Keith McConnell; Robert J Fleck; Sally R Shott; Raouf S Amin; Ephraim J Gutmark
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A Subject-Specific Acoustic Model of the Upper Airway for Snoring Sounds Generation.

Authors:  Shumit Saha; T Douglas Bradley; Mahsa Taheri; Zahra Moussavi; Azadeh Yadollahi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Are annoyance scores based on sound pressure levels suitable for snoring assessment in the home environment?

Authors:  René Fischer; Franziska Unverdorben; Thomas S Kuehnel; Veronika Vielsmeier; Gerrit Spanier; Steven C Marcrum; Christian Rohrmeier
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.816

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.