Literature DB >> 19551439

Current technique of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME): an international questionnaire among 368 surgeons.

Y M Cheung1, M M Lange, M Buunen, J F Lange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current literature shows no consensus for the technique of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME). This study aimed to assess the current practice of LTME.
METHODS: From January to March 2008, members of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), the Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo-Surgeons (IAGES), and the Society of Laparoscopic Surgeons (SLS), together with renowned surgeons in the field of LTME, were invited to fill out an online questionnaire concerning aspects of LTME.
RESULTS: The 368 questionnaires showed that 77% of the study participants performed 1-20 LTMEs per year (low volume) and that 33% performed more than 20 LTMEs per year (high volume). Preoperative bowel preparation (PBP), Trendelenburg position, periumbilical insertion of a 30º laparoscope, medial-to-lateral dissection, ultrasonic hemostasis, high-tie ligation, splenic flexure mobilization, left ureteral identification, partial sigmoid resection, extraction of the specimen by a new minilaparotomy and wound protector, end-to-end stapled anastomosis using a 28- to 29-mm anvil with 3.5-mm staples, abdominal lavage, pelvic drainage, and diverting ileostoma were performed by a majority of the surgeons. Less consistency was observed in identification of the right ureter, dissection of Denonvilliers' fascia, location of the minilaparotomy, and construction of a colonic pouch. There were significant differences between high and low volume and between American and European surgeons. Significantly more low-volume surgeons indicated a preference for an open TME depending on the age and gender of the patient, the presence of comorbidity, previous laparotomy, and locally advanced tumor. More low-volume surgeons applied PBP (83.4% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.017). On the average, high-volume surgeons identified more autonomic pelvic nerves during dissection (2.6 vs. 1.8 nerves). The right ureter was identified by 66% of the American and 31.2% of the European surgeons. In the United States 91.5% and in Europe 61.2% created an end-to-end anastomosis. Pouches were created by 32% of the European and 6.8% of the American surgeons.
CONCLUSION: The respondents showed an apparent preference for several aspects of LTME. Differences were related to expertise and still more to continent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19551439     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0566-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Rectal cancer surgery without mechanical bowel preparation.

Authors:  F Bretagnol; A Alves; A Ricci; P Valleur; Y Panis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Cedermark; M Dahlberg; B Glimelius; L Påhlman; L E Rutqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A new approach to rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1979-09

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.

Authors:  P Vukasin; A E Ortega; F L Greene; G D Steele; A J Simons; G J Anthone; L A Weston; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Koen C M J Peeters; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Theo Wiggers; Harm Rutten; Lars Pahlman; Bengt Glimelius; Jan Willem Leer; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  21 in total

1.  Advances and high demands in totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos Katsios; Georgios Baltogiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Standards, advances and challenges in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  New technology-based innovation changes surgical practice and research direction in solid cancers.

Authors:  Christos Katsios; Georgios Baltogiannis; Dimitrios H Roukos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a highly demanding procedure.

Authors:  Christos G Katsios; Georgios Baltogiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  High-quality clinical practice: laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Georgios Baltogiannis; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Sparing minilaparotomy in robotic low anterior resection for cancer.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: examining lymph nodes or standardizing surgery?

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Reducing anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection: is it achievable by a new method?

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection?

Authors:  R M Carlson; P L Roberts; J F Hall; P W Marcello; D J Schoetz; T E Read; R Ricciardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.