Literature DB >> 19550238

Resolving controversies in hip fracture care: the need for large collaborative trials in hip fractures.

Mohit Bhandari1, Sheila Sprague, Emil H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and the burden of disability associated with hip fractures globally vindicate the need for high-quality research to advance the care of patients with hip fractures. Historically, large, multi-centre randomized controlled trials have been rare in the orthopaedic trauma literature. Similar to other medical specialties, orthopaedic research is currently undergoing a paradigm shift from single centre initiatives to larger collaborative groups. This is evident with the establishment of several collaborative groups in Canada, in the United States, and in Europe, which has proven that multi-centre trials can be extremely successful in orthopaedic trauma research.Despite ever increasing literature on the topic of his fractures, the optimal treatment of hip fractures remains unknown and controversial. To resolve this controversy large multi-national collaborative randomized controlled trials are required. In 2005, the International Hip Fracture Research Collaborative was officially established following funding from the Canadian Institute of Health Research International Opportunity Program with the mandate of resolving controversies in hip fracture management. This manuscript will describe the need, the information, the organization, and the accomplishments to date of the International Hip Fracture Research Collaborative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19550238      PMCID: PMC2954961          DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a772e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  21 in total

1.  The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Robin R Richards; Sheila Sprague; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Mohit Bhandari; Mike Clarke; Victor M Montori; Deborah J Cook; Salim Yusuf; David L Sackett; Claudio S Cinà; S D Walter; Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; Geoffrey R Norman; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-08

3.  Multicenter clinical trials in orthopaedics: time for musculoskeletal specialty societies to take action.

Authors:  James G Wright; Mark C Gebhardt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Symposium. How to participate in orthopaedic randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephen B Trippel; Michael J Bosse; David A Heck; James G Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Rationale, design, and organization of the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) trial: a randomized controlled trial of metoprolol versus placebo in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Homer Yang; Gordon H Guyatt; Kate Leslie; Juan Carlos Villar; Victor M Monteri; Peter Choi; Julian W Giles; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Clinical trial design in fracture-healing research: meeting the challenge.

Authors:  Saam Morshed; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Gordon Guyatt; Paul Tornetta; Emil H Schemitsch; Marc Swiontkowski; David Sanders; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Homer Yang; Salim Yusuf; Gordon Guyatt; Kate Leslie; Juan Carlos Villar; Denis Xavier; Susan Chrolavicius; Launi Greenspan; Janice Pogue; Prem Pais; Lisheng Liu; Shouchun Xu; German Málaga; Alvaro Avezum; Matthew Chan; Victor M Montori; Mike Jacka; Peter Choi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Gordon Guyatt; Paul Tornetta; Emil Schemitsch; Marc Swiontkowski; David Sanders; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  15 in total

1.  Cochrane in CORR®: Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Kim Madden; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Prolonged pre-operative hospital stay as a predictive factor for early outcomes and mortality after geriatric hip fracture surgery: a single institution open prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Goran Tulic; Emilija Dubljanin-Raspopovic; Sanja Tomanovic-Vujadinovic; Jelena Sopta; Aleksandar Todorovic; Radovan Manojlovic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Cochrane in CORR ®: Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults (review).

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Recent aspects on outcomes in geriatric fracture patients.

Authors:  N Suhm; D Rikli; S Schaeren; P Studer; M Jakob; S L Kates
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Association of Overlapping Surgery With Increased Risk for Complications Following Hip Surgery: A Population-Based, Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bheeshma Ravi; Daniel Pincus; David Wasserstein; Anand Govindarajan; Anjie Huang; Peter C Austin; Richard Jenkinson; Patrick D G Henry; J Michael Paterson; Hans J Kreder
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Hip fracture registries: utility, description, and comparison.

Authors:  P Sáez-López; F Brañas; N Sánchez-Hernández; N Alonso-García; J I González-Montalvo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Factors associated with delayed surgery in elderly hip fractures in India.

Authors:  Jaiben George; Vijay Sharma; Kamran Farooque; Samarth Mittal; Vivek Trikha; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 8.  Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Paul T P W Burgers; Arnoud R Van Geene; Michel P J Van den Bekerom; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Bastiaan Blom; Ilyas S Aleem; M Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Fixation versus primary replacement of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Ilyas S Aleem; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  Uneven global distribution of randomized trials in hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Marco Yeung; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.