Literature DB >> 19549804

Optimized detection of differential expression in global profiling experiments: case studies in clinical transcriptomic and quantitative proteomic datasets.

Laura L Elo1, Jukka Hiissa, Jarno Tuimala, Aleksi Kallio, Eija Korpelainen, Tero Aittokallio.   

Abstract

Identification of reliable molecular markers that show differential expression between distinct groups of samples has remained a fundamental research problem in many large-scale profiling studies, such as those based on DNA microarray or mass-spectrometry technologies. Despite the availability of a wide spectrum of statistical procedures, the users of the high-throughput platforms are still facing the crucial challenge of deciding which test statistic is best adapted to the intrinsic properties of their own datasets. To meet this challenge, we recently introduced an adaptive procedure, named ROTS (Reproducibility-Optimized Test Statistic), which learns an optimal statistic directly from the given data, and whose relative benefits have previously been shown in comparison with state-of-the-art procedures for detecting differential expression. Using gene expression microarray and mass-spectrometry (MS)-based protein expression datasets as case studies, we illustrate here the practical usage and advantages of ROTS toward detecting reliable marker lists in clinical transcriptomic and proteomic studies. In a public leukemia microarray dataset, the procedure could improve the sensitivity of the gene marker lists detected with high specificity. When applied to a recent LC-MS dataset, involving plasma samples from severe burn patients, the procedure could identify several peptide markers that remained undetected in the conventional analysis, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of ROTS also for global quantitative proteomic studies. To promote its widespread usage, we have made freely available efficient implementations of ROTS, which are easily accessible either as a stand-alone R-package or as integrated in the open-source data analysis software Chipster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549804     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbp033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  11 in total

1.  Microarray assessment of the influence of the conceptus on gene expression in the mouse uterus during decidualization.

Authors:  M E McConaha; K Eckstrum; J An; J J Steinle; B M Bany
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  ROTS: reproducible RNA-seq biomarker detector-prognostic markers for clear cell renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Fatemeh Seyednasrollah; Krista Rantanen; Panu Jaakkola; Laura L Elo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Combined transcriptome and proteome profiling reveals specific molecular brain signatures for sex, maturation and circalunar clock phase.

Authors:  Sven Schenk; Stephanie C Bannister; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Dorothea Anrather; Bui Quang Minh; Andrea Bileck; Markus Hartl; Arndt von Haeseler; Christopher Gerner; Florian Raible; Kristin Tessmar-Raible
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  MMP1 bimodal expression and differential response to inflammatory mediators is linked to promoter polymorphisms.

Authors:  Muna Affara; Benjamin J Dunmore; Deborah A Sanders; Nicola Johnson; Cristin G Print; D Stephen Charnock-Jones
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Chipster: user-friendly analysis software for microarray and other high-throughput data.

Authors:  M Aleksi Kallio; Jarno T Tuimala; Taavi Hupponen; Petri Klemelä; Massimiliano Gentile; Ilari Scheinin; Mikko Koski; Janne Käki; Eija I Korpelainen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Optimized detection of transcription factor-binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.

Authors:  Laura L Elo; Aleksi Kallio; Teemu D Laajala; R David Hawkins; Eija Korpelainen; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Empirical comparison of structure-based pathway methods.

Authors:  Maria K Jaakkola; Laura L Elo
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  A comparative proteomic study of plasma in Colombian childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Sandra Isabel Calderon-Rodríguez; María Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Adriana Umaña-Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  MS1 ion current-based quantitative proteomics: A promising solution for reliable analysis of large biological cohorts.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Shichen Shen; Sailee Suryakant Rasam; Jun Qu
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Comparison of software packages for detecting differential expression in RNA-seq studies.

Authors:  Fatemeh Seyednasrollah; Asta Laiho; Laura L Elo
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.