Literature DB >> 19549645

External validation of the modified Thoracoscore in a new thoracic surgery program: prediction of in-hospital mortality.

Themistokles Chamogeorgakis1, Ioannis Toumpoulis, Periclis Tomos, Costas Ieromonachos, Dimitrios Angouras, Emmanouil Georgiannakis, Panagiotis Michail, Chris Rokkas.   

Abstract

Informed consent prior to any surgical intervention should include in-hospital survival estimation after the procedure performed. The recently developed Thoracoscore predicts well the postoperative mortality possibility. The purpose of our study was to test the modified Thoracoscore performance in our new thoracic program. One hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients underwent thoracic surgery procedure within two years. The procedures performed were: 62 lung resections, 10 open tumor biopsies, 21 neck and mediastinal procedures, 33 chest wall and pleural procedures, 8 tracheal procedures, 3 esophageal procedures, 13 minor cardiac procedures, and 5 chest trauma cases. The modified Thoracoscore was calculated based on the following variables: age, gender, priority of the procedure, malignancy, type of procedure, Zubrod score, ASA class, and number of co-morbidities. The observed mortality was 5.2% (eight deaths) while the predicted one based on the modified Thoracoscore was 4.9%. The scoring system we used had excellent discriminatory ability with a C statistic (0.95, 95% CIs 0.91-0.99). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was not statistically significant (P=0.82), indicating acceptable calibration of the model for the present series. The modified Thoracoscore's ability to predict postoperative survival in the whole context of thoracic surgery performs well in our program. Application of any risk scoring system requires external validation and provides comparison of the actual outcomes with other programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549645     DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2008.201178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  7 in total

1.  Ethnicity in Anaesthesia research: Time to search our own backyards!

Authors:  Madhusudan Upadya; Padmaja Durga; Sumesh T Rao; Madhuri S Kurdi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  Thoracoscore: Does it predict mortality in the Indian scenario? - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Archana Pathy; Prachi Kar; Ramachandran Gopinath; Divya Gubba; N Soujanya Rani; A Kanimozhi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-12

3.  A systematic review of risk prediction models for perioperative mortality after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Taylor; Syed F Hashmi; Glen P Martin; Michael Shackcloth; Rajesh Shah; Richard Booton; Stuart W Grant
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

4.  Thoracoscore and European Society Objective Score Fail to Predict Mortality in the UK.

Authors:  Annabel Sharkey; Priyadharshanan Ariyaratnam; Vladimir Anikin; Elizabeth Belcher; Simon Kendall; Eric Lim; Babu Naidu; Wyn Parry; Mahmoud Loubani
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2015-02-14

5.  Scalpel or SABR for Treatment of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Clinical Considerations for the Multidisciplinary Team.

Authors:  Shervin M Shirvani; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Emmanuel O Ogundimu; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Predictive Factors for Severe Outcomes in Ischemic Colitis.

Authors:  Seok Reyol Choi; Sam Ryong Jee; Geun Am Song; Seun Ja Park; Jong Hun Lee; Chul Soo Song; Hee Ug Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.519

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.