Literature DB >> 19546155

Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the perisylvian language networks.

Hua-Dong Xiang1, Hubert M Fonteijn, David G Norris, Peter Hagoort.   

Abstract

We performed a resting-state functional connectivity study to investigate directly the functional correlations within the perisylvian language networks by seeding from 3 subregions of Broca's complex (pars opercularis, pars triangularis, and pars orbitalis) and their right hemisphere homologues. A clear topographical functional connectivity pattern in the left middle frontal, parietal, and temporal areas was revealed for the 3 left seeds. This is the first demonstration that a functional connectivity topology can be observed in the perisylvian language networks. The results support the assumption of the functional division for phonology, syntax, and semantics of Broca's complex as proposed by the memory, unification, and control (MUC) model and indicated a topographical functional organization in the perisylvian language networks, which suggests a possible division of labor for phonological, syntactic, and semantic function in the left frontal, parietal, and temporal areas.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19546155     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  78 in total

1.  Network-level structural covariance in the developing brain.

Authors:  Brandon A Zielinski; Efstathios D Gennatas; Juan Zhou; William W Seeley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution.

Authors:  Dietrich Stout; Thierry Chaminade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Beta oscillations relate to the N400m during language comprehension.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Ole Jensen; Danielle van den Brink; Nienke Weder; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Lilla Magyari; Peter Hagoort; Marcel Bastiaansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  The neurobiology of syntax: beyond string sets.

Authors:  Karl Magnus Petersson; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Decoding temporal structure in music and speech relies on shared brain resources but elicits different fine-scale spatial patterns.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Anjali Bhatara; Srikanth Ryali; Evan Balaban; Daniel J Levitin; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural correlates of audiotactile phonetic processing in early-blind readers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Yasaman Nojaba; Habib Ganjgahi; Asie Amousoltani; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Presurgical brain mapping of the language network in patients with brain tumors using resting-state fMRI: Comparison with task fMRI.

Authors:  Haris I Sair; Noushin Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi; Vince D Calhoun; Raag D Airan; Shruti Agarwal; Jarunee Intrapiromkul; Ann S Choe; Sachin K Gujar; Brian Caffo; Martin A Lindquist; Jay J Pillai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Functional activation independently contributes to naming ability and relates to lesion site in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Elizabeth H Lacey; Shihui Xing; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Altered resting functional connectivity of expressive language regions after speed reading training.

Authors:  Michael A Ferguson; Jared A Nielsen; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 10.  Neurophysiological preconditions of syntax acquisition.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Regine Oberecker; Jens Brauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.