Literature DB >> 19545788

Induction and rejoining of DNA double strand breaks assessed by H2AX phosphorylation in melanoma cells irradiated with proton and lithium beams.

Irene L Ibañez1, Candelaria Bracalente, Beatriz L Molinari, Mónica A Palmieri, Lucía Policastro, Andrés J Kreiner, Alejandro A Burlón, Alejandro Valda, Daniela Navalesi, Jorge Davidson, Miguel Davidson, Mónica Vázquez, Mabel Ozafrán, Hebe Durán.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the induction and rejoining of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in melanoma cells exposed to low and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DSBs and survival were determined as a function of dose in melanoma cells (B16-F0) irradiated with monoenergetic proton and lithium beams and with a gamma source. Survival curves were obtained by clonogenic assay and fitted to the linear-quadratic model. DSBs were evaluated by the detection of phosphorylated histone H2AX (gammaH2AX) foci at 30 min and 6 h post-irradiation.
RESULTS: Survival curves showed the increasing effectiveness of radiation as a function of LET. gammaH2AX labeling showed an increase in the number of foci vs. dose for all the radiations evaluated. A decrease in the number of foci was found at 6 h post-irradiation for low LET radiation, revealing the repair capacity of DSBs. An increase in the size of gammaH2AX foci in cells irradiated with lithium beams was found, as compared with gamma and proton irradiations, which could be attributed to the clusters of DSBs induced by high LET radiation. Foci size increased at 6 h post-irradiation for lithium and proton irradiations in relation with persistent DSBs, showing a correlation with surviving fraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the response of B16-F0 cells to charged particle beams evaluated by the detection of gammaH2AX foci. We conclude that gammaH2AX foci size is an accurate parameter to correlate the rejoining of DSBs induced by different LET radiations and radiosensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19545788     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and Review of Clinical Evidence of Variations in Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 8.013

2.  In vitro studies of DNA damage and repair mechanisms induced by BNCT in a poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma cell line.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; M Carpano; P Curotto; S Thorp; M Casal; G Juvenal; M Pisarev; M A Dagrosa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  DNA double-strand break induction in Ku80-deficient CHO cells following boron neutron capture reaction.

Authors:  Yuko Kinashi; Sentaro Takahashi; Genro Kashino; Ryuichi Okayasu; Shinichiro Masunaga; Minoru Suzuki; Koji Ono
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Restoration of G1 chemo/radioresistance and double-strand-break repair proficiency by wild-type but not endonuclease-deficient Artemis.

Authors:  Susovan Mohapatra; Misako Kawahara; Imran S Khan; Steven M Yannone; Lawrence F Povirk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  High linear-energy-transfer radiation can overcome radioresistance of glioma stem-like cells to low linear-energy-transfer radiation.

Authors:  Yuki Hirota; Shin-Ichiro Masunaga; Natsuko Kondo; Shinji Kawabata; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Hirohiko Yajima; Akira Fujimori; Koji Ono; Toshihiko Kuroiwa; Shin-Ichi Miyatake
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Proteomic analysis of proton beam irradiated human melanoma cells.

Authors:  Sylwia Kedracka-Krok; Urszula Jankowska; Martyna Elas; Urszula Sowa; Jan Swakon; Agnieszka Cierniak; Pawel Olko; Bozena Romanowska-Dixon; Krystyna Urbanska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: A Review of Clinical Experiences and Preclinical Research, with an Emphasis on DNA Damage/Repair.

Authors:  Osama Mohamad; Brock J Sishc; Janapriya Saha; Arnold Pompos; Asal Rahimi; Michael D Story; Anthony J Davis; D W Nathan Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Systematic analysis of RBE and related quantities using a database of cell survival experiments with ion beam irradiation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich; Uwe Scholz; Thilo Elsässer; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Carbon ion beam combined with cisplatin effectively disrupts triple negative breast cancer stem-like cells in vitro.

Authors:  Sei Sai; Guillaume Vares; Eun Ho Kim; Kumiko Karasawa; Bing Wang; Mitsuru Nenoi; Yoshiya Horimoto; Mitsuhiro Hayashi
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 10.  Sensitization of Cancer Cells to Radiation and Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Camptothecin Using Inhibitors of PARP and Other Signaling Molecules.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuno; Mai Hyodo; Haruka Fujimori; Atsuhiro Shimizu; Ken-Ichi Yoshioka
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.