| Literature DB >> 19545673 |
B E Hardy1, T Shah, J Cicciarelli, K V Lemley, I V Hutchinson, Y W Cho.
Abstract
Specific pediatric allocation schemes can not only lead to minimization of waiting time, but also to better clinical outcomes for children with end-stage renal disease. The outcome of 4125 deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) aged 5-35 years were compared with those of 6456 living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Unadjusted graft survival rates of DDKT were significantly lower than those of LDKT (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.53; P < .001). Chronic rejection was reported in 416 (10.1%) of 4125 in the DDKT group compared with 537 (8.3%) of 6456 in the LDKT group (P < .001). Among African American recipients, 67 (3.4%) grafts were lost due to noncompliance as a contributory cause of failure compared with 126 (1.5%) among other races (P < .001). A significantly lower incidence of noncompliance was observed in children (0.9%) compared with adolescents (2.2% in ages 10-14; P < .001) and high teens (2.0% in ages 15-20; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that adjusted graft survival rates of LDKT were superior to DDKT (HR = 1.22; P < .001) after adjusting for recipient race, recipient age, regraft status, and HLA mismatch. The differences of long-term graft survival rates between DDKT and LDKT have not been reduced (4% at 1 year, 10% at 3 years, and 12% at 5 years for unadjusted survival rates and 3% at 1 year, 6% at 3 years, and 9% at 5 years adjusted survival rates). In our analysis presented here the difference in graft survival between LDKT and DDKT has doubled compared with earlier analysis. Therefore, we recommend LDKT whenever possible as a first choice for pediatric transplant recipients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19545673 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.01.102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transplant Proc ISSN: 0041-1345 Impact factor: 1.066