Literature DB >> 19544896

Role of sulfur during acetate oxidation in biological anodes.

Paritam K Dutta1, Jürg Keller, Zhiguo Yuan, René A Rozendal, Korneel Rabaey.   

Abstract

The treatment of wastewater containing sulfides in bioelec-trochemical systems (BES) causes deposition of sulfur on the anode as a result of a solely electrochemical process. In this study, we investigate whether microorganisms can use this sulfur, ratherthan the anode or soluble sulfate, as an electron acceptor for the oxidation of acetate. Our results indicate that microorganisms use electrodeposited sulfur as preferable electron acceptor over the anode and sulfate and produce sulfide irrespective of electrochemical conditions. Bioelectrochemical and biological sulfide generation pathways were studied under different electrochemical conditions. The obtained results show that the sulfide generation rate at open circuit condition (anode potential -235 +/- 5 mV versus standard hydrogen electrode, SHE)was higher in comparison to the electrochemical sulfide generation even at a lower potential of -275 mV (vs SHE), confirming that sulfide is produced through biological processes without any current generation. However, during closed circuit operation, the overall Coulombic efficiency (97% +/- 2%) is not affected as the produced sulfide (originating from the reduction of deposited sulfur) is spontaneously reoxidized to sulfur when a favorable potential is maintained. This confirms the mediator role of sulfur during acetate oxidation in BES. A diagrammatic representation of the mechanism is proposed to characterize the interactions between acetate oxidation and sulfur conversions on the anode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544896     DOI: 10.1021/es803682k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

Review 1.  Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; René A Rozendal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Anodes Stimulate Anaerobic Toluene Degradation via Sulfur Cycling in Marine Sediments.

Authors:  Matteo Daghio; Eleni Vaiopoulou; Sunil A Patil; Ana Suárez-Suárez; Ian M Head; Andrea Franzetti; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Enriching distinctive microbial communities from marine sediments via an electrochemical-sulfide-oxidizing process on carbon electrodes.

Authors:  Shiue-Lin Li; Kenneth H Nealson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Process and kinetics of azo dye decolourization in bioelectrochemical systems: effect of several key factors.

Authors:  Hou-Yun Yang; Chuan-Shu He; Lei Li; Jie Zhang; Jin-You Shen; Yang Mu; Han-Qing Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Factors affecting the efficiency of a bioelectrochemical system: a review.

Authors:  Xiaolin Zhang; Xiaojing Li; Xiaodong Zhao; Yongtao Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Microbiome Composition and Dynamics of a Reductive/Oxidative Bioelectrochemical System for Perchloroethylene Removal: Effect of the Feeding Composition.

Authors:  Maria L Di Franca; Bruna Matturro; Simona Crognale; Marco Zeppilli; Edoardo Dell'Armi; Mauro Majone; Marco Petrangeli Papini; Simona Rossetti
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 7.  Role of vitamins and minerals as immunity boosters in COVID-19.

Authors:  Puneet Kumar; Mandeep Kumar; Onkar Bedi; Manisha Gupta; Sachin Kumar; Gagandeep Jaiswal; Vikrant Rahi; Narhari Gangaram Yedke; Anjali Bijalwan; Shubham Sharma; Sumit Jamwal
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Comparative insights into genome signatures of ferric iron oxide- and anode-stimulated Desulfuromonas spp. strains.

Authors:  Yong Guo; Tomo Aoyagi; Tomoyuki Hori
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.