Literature DB >> 19544726

Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction.

J R Thomson1, A J Moilanen, P A Vesk, A F Bennett, R Mac Nally.   

Abstract

Restoration of native vegetation is required in many regions of the world, but determining priority locations for revegetation is a complex problem. We consider the problem of determining spatial and temporal priorities for revegetation to maximize habitat for 62 bird species within a heavily cleared agricultural region, 11000 km2 in area. We show how a reserve-selection framework can be applied to a complex, large-scale restoration-planning problem to account for multi-species objectives and connectivity requirements at a spatial extent and resolution relevant to management. Our approach explicitly accounts for time lags in planting and development of habitat resources, which is intended to avoid future population bottlenecks caused by delayed provision of critical resources, such as tree hollows. We coupled species-specific models of expected habitat quality and fragmentation effects with the dynamics of habitat suitability following replanting to produce species-specific maps for future times. Spatial priorities for restoration were determined by ranking locations (150-m grid cells) by their expected contribution to species habitat through time using the conservation planning tool, "Zonation." We evaluated solutions by calculating expected trajectories of habitat availability for each species. We produced a spatially explicit revegetation schedule for the region that resulted in a balanced increase in habitat for all species. Priority areas for revegetation generally were clustered around existing vegetation, although not always. Areas on richer soils and with high rainfall were more highly ranked, reflecting their potential to support high-quality habitats that have been disproportionately cleared for agriculture. Accounting for delayed development of habitat resources altered the rank-order of locations in the derived revegetation plan and led to improved expected outcomes for fragmentation-sensitive species. This work demonstrates the potential for systematic restoration planning at large scales that accounts for multiple objectives, which is urgently needed by land and natural resource managers.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544726     DOI: 10.1890/08-0915.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  12 in total

1.  Native bird breeding in a chronosequence of revegetated sites.

Authors:  Katherine Selwood; Ralph Mac Nally; James R Thomson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Maximizing benefits from riparian revegetation efforts: local- and landscape-level determinants of avian response.

Authors:  Thomas Gardali; Aaron L Holmes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?

Authors:  Jian D L Yen; James R Thomson; Ralph Mac Nally
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally.

Authors:  Kerrie A Wilson; Megan C Evans; Moreno Di Marco; David C Green; Luigi Boitani; Hugh P Possingham; Federica Chiozza; Carlo Rondinini
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Safeguarding Ecosystem Services: A Methodological Framework to Buffer the Joint Effect of Habitat Configuration and Climate Change.

Authors:  Tereza C Giannini; Leandro R Tambosi; André L Acosta; Rodolfo Jaffé; Antonio M Saraiva; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca; Jean Paul Metzger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimization in the utility maximization framework for conservation planning: a comparison of solution procedures in a study of multifunctional agriculture.

Authors:  Jason Kreitler; David M Stoms; Frank W Davis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits.

Authors:  Brad H McRae; Sonia A Hall; Paul Beier; David M Theobald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections.

Authors:  Heini Kujala; Atte Moilanen; Miguel B Araújo; Mar Cabeza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.

Authors:  Carly N Cook; Michael B Mascia; Mark W Schwartz; Hugh P Possingham; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Impediments to the success of management actions for species recovery.

Authors:  Chooi Fei Ng; Hugh P Possingham; Clive A McAlpine; Deidré L de Villiers; Harriet J Preece; Jonathan R Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.