Literature DB >> 19543970

Assigned versus random, countermeasure-like responses in the p300 based complex trial protocol for detection of deception: task demand effects.

John B Meixner1, Alexander Haynes, Michael R Winograd, Jordan Brown, J Peter Rosenfeld.   

Abstract

We recently introduced an accurate and countermeasure resistant P300-based deception detection test called the complex trial protocol (Rosenfeld et al. in Psychophysiology 45(6):906-919, 2008). When subjects use countermeasures to all irrelevant items in the test, the probe P300 is increased rather than reduced (as it was in previous P300-based deception protocols), allowing detection of countermeasure users. The current experiment examines the role of task demand on the complex trial protocol by forcing the subject to make countermeasure-like response to stimuli. Subjects made either a simple random button response to both probe and irrelevant stimuli (experiment 1) or a more complex, assigned, button response to probe and irrelevant stimuli (experiment 2). We found that an increase in task demand reduced the effectiveness of the test. Using random responses we found a simple guilty hit rate of 11/12 with no false positives, but only a 4/11 hit rate for countermeasure-users. Using assigned responses we found a simple guilty hit rate of 8/15 with no false positives, and a 7/16 hit rate for countermeasure-users. We herein suggest that the high level of task demand associated with these countermeasure-like responses causes reduced hit rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19543970     DOI: 10.1007/s10484-009-9091-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback        ISSN: 1090-0586


  7 in total

1.  An Independent Validation of the EEG-Based Complex Trial Protocol with Autobiographical Data and Corroboration of its Resistance to a Cognitively Charged Countermeasure.

Authors:  Michel Funicelli; Lauren White; Sabina Ungureanu; Jean-Roch Laurence
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2021-03-02

2.  Brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Lawrence A Farwell
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Brain fingerprinting field studies comparing P300-MERMER and P300 brainwave responses in the detection of concealed information.

Authors:  Lawrence A Farwell; Drew C Richardson; Graham M Richardson
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Brain fingerprinting classification concealed information test detects US Navy military medical information with P300.

Authors:  Lawrence A Farwell; Drew C Richardson; Graham M Richardson; John J Furedy
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Item Roles Explored in a Modified P300-Based CTP Concealed Information Test.

Authors:  Gáspár Lukács; Alicja Grządziel; Marleen Kempkes; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2019-09

6.  The effect of mental countermeasures on a novel brain-based feedback concealed information test.

Authors:  Jinbin Zheng; Jiayu Cheng; Chongxiang Wang; Xiaohong Lin; Genyue Fu; Liyang Sai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.399

7.  Brain fingerprinting: let's focus on the science-a reply to Meijer, Ben-Shakhar, Verschuere, and Donchin.

Authors:  Lawrence A Farwell; Drew C Richardson
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.082

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.