Literature DB >> 19543799

Trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates by age, race/ethnicity, and indices of access to medical care, 1995–2004 (United States).

Yongping Hao1, Ahmedin Jemal, Xingyou Zhang, Elizabeth M Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates in the US decreased rapidly since 1998. This is largely thought to reflect increases in utilization of CRC screening through detection and removal of adenomatous polyps. However, the extent to which the decrease varies by age, race/ethnicity, and differences in access to medical care is largely unknown.
METHODS: Temporal trends in CRC incidence rates were examined from 1995 to 2004 by regression analysis according to age (50-64, ≥ 65), race/ethnicity (whites, African Americans, and Hispanics), and categories of county-level indicators of access to care (poverty, primary care physician supply [PCP], uninsured rate [age 50-64], and metro/nonmetro) using incidence data from 19 cancer registries, covering about 53% of the US population. Changes in colorectal endoscopic screening and fecal occult blood stool test (FOBT) from 1995-1997 to 2002-2004 for the same set of county-level indicators were also analyzed, using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
RESULTS: Among whites, CRC incidence rates decreased significantly from 1998 through 2004 in age ≥ 65, but not in age 50-64 in counties with high uninsured or poverty rates, fewer PCPs, or in nonmetro areas. Among African Americans or Hispanics, rates did not decrease in age 50-64 in general and age ≥ 65 in counties with high poverty rates, low PCP supply, and nonmetro counties (African Americans). Colorectal endoscopic screening rates increased significantly among whites in both age groups, but not among Hispanics (aged 50-64 in general and aged ≥ 65 residing in high poverty counties) or African Americans residing in counties with higher uninsured rates (age 50-64), low PCP supply, high poverty rates, and nonmetro counties (age ≥ 65). FOBT rates remained unchanged during the study time period.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that individuals residing in poorer communities with lower access to medical care have not experienced the reduction in CRC incidence rates that have benefited more affluent communities; these disparities may be related to health care access barriers to colorectal endoscopic screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19543799     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-009-9379-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  20 in total

1.  An examination between census tract unhealthy food availability and colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Derrick C Gibson; John D Prochaska; Xiaoying Yu; Sapna Kaul
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer: proctocolectomy and mucosectomy do not necessarily eliminate pouch-related cancer incidences.

Authors:  Amosy E M'Koma; Harold L Moses; Samuel E Adunyah
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Racial differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Cynthia A Thomson; Erin Pettijohn; Ikuko Kato; Rebecca J Rodabough; Dorothy Lane; F Allan Hubbell; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Lucille Adams-Campbell; Charles P Mouton; Judith Abrams; Rowan T Chlebowski
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Inappropriate Use of Radioactive Iodine for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer Is Most Common in Regions with Poor Access to Healthcare.

Authors:  Jennifer L Marti; Louise Davies; Megan R Haymart; Benjamin R Roman; R Michael Tuttle; Luc G T Morris
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 5.  Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Susan L Hayes; Mei Hsuan Chen; Javier González; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

6.  Treatment and Survival of Medicare Beneficiaries with Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between a Rural State Cancer Registry and National Data.

Authors:  Pallavi B Rane; S Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi; Kalidindi Sita; Sobha Kurian; Xiaoyun Pan
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Burden of emergency and non-emergency colorectal cancer surgeries in West Virginia and the USA.

Authors:  Neel A Shah; Joel Halverson; Suresh Madhavan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-03

9.  Recent trends in the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the US National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2015.

Authors:  John Virostko; Anna Capasso; Thomas E Yankeelov; Boone Goodgame
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Understanding cancer screening service utilization by Somali men in Minnesota.

Authors:  Barrett Sewali; Rebekah Pratt; Ekland Abdiwahab; Saeed Fahia; Kathleen Thiede Call; Kolawole S Okuyemi
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.