Literature DB >> 19542514

Genetic relationships among pig behavior, growth, backfat, and loin muscle area.

B D Velie1, C Maltecca, J P Cassady.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate repeatabilities and heritabilities for measures of pig behavior and their relationship with performance. Measures of behavior and performance included the backtest, resident-intruder test, human approach test (HAT), novel object test (NOT), d 1 BW, backfat depth (BF), loin muscle area (LMA), ADG in the farrowing house, ADG, 21-d BW, and 140-d BW (W). Each behavioral trait was measured twice. The study consisted of 95 litters from 31 sires with an average of 3 litters per sire (n >or= 457). Between 7 and 14 d of age, the backtest was conducted by placing each pig in a supine position for 60 s. Total time spent struggling (TTS) and total number of attempts to struggle (TAS) were recorded. The resident intruder test involved 2 nursery pigs, a resident pig and an unfamiliar intruder pig. The resident pen was divided in half by a solid partition. A resident pig was placed in the test area, and an intruder pig was then introduced. Latency until an attack occurred (LAT) and total number of attacks over 2 tests (RIS) were recorded. Amount of time taken for each finishing pig to make snout contact with an unfamiliar human or object was recorded. Dam and sire effects influenced all traits (P < 0.01). Sex and pen affected LAT, RIS, HAT, and NOT (P < 0.10). Repeatabilities of TTS, TAS, RIS, LAT, HAT, and NOT were 0.38, 0.21, 0.07, 0.08, 0.17, and 0.11, respectively. The phenotypic correlations of TTS with TAS and HAT with NOT were 0.61 and 0.34, respectively. Phenotypic correlation between RIS and LAT was -0.85. Total time spent struggling and TAS tended to be phenotypically correlated with 21-d BW and ADG in the farrowing house. Total attempts to struggle were phenotypically correlated with BF (0.15). Latency until an attack occurred was phenotypically correlated with LMA (0.23). Resident intruder score was phenotypically correlated with ADG (-0.13), W (-0.13), and LMA (-0.21) and estimated to be lowly heritable (h(2) = 0.12). Heritabilities of TTS and TAS were 0.31 and 0.53, respectively. Genetic correlation of TAS with ADG and W was 0.38. Genetic correlations of TTS with BF, W, and TAS were 0.14, 0.18, and 0.81, respectively. The backtest is a heritable and repeatable measure of a behavioral characteristic in pigs that is phenotypically and genetically correlated with performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19542514     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Behavioural genetic differences between Chinese and European pigs.

Authors:  Qingpo Chu; Tingting Liang; Lingling Fu; Huizhi Li; Bo Zhou
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Exploring the association between microbiota and behaviour in suckling piglets.

Authors:  R Choudhury; A Middelkoop; J E Bolhuis; M Kleerebezem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The fight-or-flight response is associated with PBMC expression profiles related to immune defence and recovery in swine.

Authors:  Michael Oster; Mathias Scheel; Eduard Muráni; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Manuela Zebunke; Birger Puppe; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genome-wide association of changes in swine feeding behaviour due to heat stress.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Brittney N Keel; Tami M Brown-Brandl; Joseph P Cassady; Gary A Rohrer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Effects of early and later life environmental enrichment and personality on attention bias in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Lu Luo; Inonge Reimert; Elske N de Haas; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Effects of early life and current housing on sensitivity to reward loss in a successive negative contrast test in pigs.

Authors:  L Luo; I Reimert; E A M Graat; S Smeets; B Kemp; J E Bolhuis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Integrated Genome-wide association and hypothalamus eQTL studies indicate a link between the circadian rhythm-related gene PER1 and coping behavior.

Authors:  Siriluck Ponsuksili; Manuela Zebunke; Eduard Murani; Nares Trakooljul; Joachim Krieter; Birger Puppe; Manfred Schwerin; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Omnivores Going Astray: A Review and New Synthesis of Abnormal Behavior in Pigs and Laying Hens.

Authors:  Emma I Brunberg; T Bas Rodenburg; Lotta Rydhmer; Joergen B Kjaer; Per Jensen; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 9.  Omics Application in Animal Science-A Special Emphasis on Stress Response and Damaging Behaviour in Pigs.

Authors:  Claudia Kasper; David Ribeiro; André M de Almeida; Catherine Larzul; Laurence Liaubet; Eduard Murani
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Suitability of traits related to aggression and handleability for integration into pig breeding programmes: Genetic parameters and comparison between Gaussian and binary trait specifications.

Authors:  Uta König von Borstel; Björn Tönepöhl; Anne K Appel; Barbara Voß; Horst Brandt; Saeid Naderi; Matthias Gauly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.