Literature DB >> 19542182

The Balanced Scorecard of acute settings: development process, definition of 20 strategic objectives and implementation.

Oliver Groene1, Elimer Brandt, Werner Schmidt, Johannes Moeller.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Strategy development and implementation in acute care settings is often restricted by competing challenges, the pace of policy reform and the existence of parallel hierarchies.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a generic approach to strategy development, illustrate the use of the Balanced Scorecard as a tool to facilitate strategy implementation and demonstrate how to break down strategic goals into measurable elements.
DESIGN: Multi-method approach using three different conceptual models: Health Promoting Hospitals Standards and Strategies, the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Model and the Balanced Scorecard. A bundle of qualitative and quantitative methods were used including in-depth interviews, standardized organization-wide surveys on organizational values, staff satisfaction and patient experience.
SETTING: Three acute care hospitals in four different locations belonging to a German holding group. PARTICIPANTS: Chief executive officer, senior medical officers, working group leaders and hospital staff. INTERVENTION(S): Development and implementation of the Balanced Scorecard. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Twenty strategic objectives with corresponding Balanced Scorecard measures.
RESULTS: A stepped approach from strategy development to implementation is presented to identify key themes for strategy development, drafting a strategy map and developing strategic objectives and measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The Balanced Scorecard, in combination with the EFQM model, is a useful tool to guide strategy development and implementation in health care organizations. As for other quality improvement and management tools not specifically developed for health care organizations, some adaptations are required to improve acceptability among professionals. The step-wise approach of strategy development and implementation presented here may support similar processes in comparable organizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19542182     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

1.  Understanding the context of balanced scorecard implementation: a hospital-based case study in Pakistan.

Authors:  Fauziah Rabbani; Sabrina Nh Lalji; Farhat Abbas; Sm Wasim Jafri; Junaid A Razzak; Naheed Nabi; Firdous Jahan; Agha Ajmal; Max Petzold; Mats Brommels; Goran Tomson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Configuring balanced scorecards for measuring health system performance: evidence from 5 years' evaluation in Afghanistan.

Authors:  Anbrasi Edward; Binay Kumar; Faizullah Kakar; Ahmad Shah Salehi; Gilbert Burnham; David H Peters
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Strategic planning, implementation, and evaluation processes in hospital systems: a survey from Iran.

Authors:  Jamil Sadeghifar; Mehdi Jafari; Shahram Tofighi; Hamid Ravaghi; Mohammad Reza Maleki
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-09-28

4.  An assessment of implementation and evaluation phases of strategic plans in Iranian hospitals.

Authors:  Jamil Sadeghifar; Shahram Tofighi; Mohamad Roshani; Zahra Toulideh; Seyedramezan Mohsenpour; Mehdi Jafari
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 5.  The Evolution of Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Its Design, Implementation, Use, and Review.

Authors:  Frida Betto; Alberto Sardi; Patrizia Garengo; Enrico Sorano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.