Literature DB >> 19542059

A survey of nurses' beliefs about the medical emergency team system in a canadian tertiary hospital.

Sean M Bagshaw1, Eugene E Mondor, Cindy Scouten, Carmel Montgomery, Linda Slater-MacLean, Daryl A Jones, Rinaldo Bellomo, R T Noel Gibney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses are the primary activators of the medical emergency team (MET). Although the MET system can empower nurses to seek help in managing acutely ill patients, few data on nurses' beliefs about the system are available.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate nurses' beliefs and behaviors about the MET system.
METHODS: Nurses from a large academic hospital in Canada were surveyed (2 demography-related questions and 17 Likert-scale questions).
RESULTS: Of 614 nurses employed on units participating in the MET system, 293 (47.7%) were approached and 275 completed the survey (response rate, 93.9%). Most respondents (84.2%) believed that the MET could prevent cardiopulmonary arrest in acutely ill patients, and 94% believed that the MET allowed them to seek help for patients they were worried about. Most nurses (75.9%) would call the responsible physician before activating the MET. Fifteen percent indicated reluctance to activate the MET because of fear of criticism, but only 2.2% considered the MET overused. Most (81.3%) believed that the MET did not increase their workload, and 91.3% did not believe that the MET reduced their skills. Forty-eight percent of nurses indicated that they would activate the MET for a patient they were worried about, even if the patient had normal vital signs.
CONCLUSION: Nurses value the MET system. Nurses believe that the MET can help them care for acutely ill patients and improve outcomes. However, barriers to MET activation exist, including a fear of criticism and an adherence to a more traditional model of first contacting the responsible physician before activating the MET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19542059     DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2009532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  17 in total

1.  Rapid response teams improve outcomes: yes.

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Francesca Rubulotta; John Welch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Medical Rapid Response in Psychiatry: Reasons for Activation and Immediate Outcome.

Authors:  Peter Manu; Kristy Loewenstein; Yankel J Girshman; Padam Bhatia; Maira Barnes; Joseph Whelan; Victoria A Solderitch; Liliana Rogozea; Marybeth McManus
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2015-12

3.  Temporal distribution of instability events in continuously monitored step-down unit patients: implications for Rapid Response Systems.

Authors:  Marilyn Hravnak; Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Eliezer Bose; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Defining impact of a rapid response team: qualitative study with nurses, physicians and hospital administrators.

Authors:  Andrea L Benin; Christopher P Borgstrom; Grace Y Jenq; Sarah A Roumanis; Leora I Horwitz
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 5.  [Benefits of medical emergency teams : Mortality on normal wards and readmission to intensive care wards].

Authors:  Uwe Hamsen; Thomas A Schildhauer; Christian Waydhas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Republished: Defining impact of a rapid response team: qualitative study with nurses, physicians and hospital administrators.

Authors:  Andrea L Benin; Christopher P Borgstrom; Grace Y Jenq; Sarah A Roumanis; Leora I Horwitz
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Rapid response systems.

Authors:  Patrick G Lyons; Dana P Edelson; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Obstetric medical emergency teams are a step forward in maternal safety!

Authors:  Hanan M F Al Kadri
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-10

9.  Satisfaction survey on the critical care response team services in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Saad Al Qahtani
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-03-21

10.  Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Michael Juntao Yuan; George Mike Finley; Ju Long; Christy Mills; Ron Kim Johnson
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.