Literature DB >> 19541917

Multicenter randomized trial of robot-assisted rehabilitation for chronic stroke: methods and entry characteristics for VA ROBOTICS.

Albert C Lo1, Peter Guarino, Hermano I Krebs, Bruce T Volpe, Christopher T Bever, Pamela W Duncan, Robert J Ringer, Todd H Wagner, Lorie G Richards, Dawn M Bravata, Jodie K Haselkorn, George F Wittenberg, Daniel G Federman, Barbara H Corn, Alysia D Maffucci, Peter Peduzzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic upper extremity impairment due to stroke has significant medical, psychosocial, and financial consequences, but few studies have examined the effectiveness of rehabilitation therapy during the chronic stroke period.
OBJECTIVE: . To test the safety and efficacy of the MIT-Manus robotic device for chronic upper extremity impairment following stroke.
METHODS: . The VA Cooperative Studies Program initiated a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in November 2006 (VA ROBOTICS). Participants with upper extremity impairment >/=6 months poststroke were randomized to robot-assisted therapy (RT), intensive comparison therapy (ICT), or usual care (UC). RT and ICT consisted of three 1-hour treatment sessions per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity motor function score at 12 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes included the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Stroke Impact Scale.
RESULTS: . A total of 127 participants were randomized: 49 to RT, 50 to ICT, and 28 to UC. The majority of participants were male (96%), with a mean age of 65 years. The primary stroke type was ischemic (85%), and 58% of strokes occurred in the anterior circulation. Twenty percent of the participants reported a stroke in addition to their index stroke. The average time from the index stroke to enrollment was 56 months (range, 6 months to 24 years). The mean Fugl-Meyer score at entry was 18.9.
CONCLUSIONS: . VA ROBOTICS demonstrates the feasibility of conducting multicenter clinical trials to rigorously test new rehabilitative devices before their introduction to clinical practice. The results are expected in early 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19541917      PMCID: PMC5583723          DOI: 10.1177/1545968309338195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  42 in total

1.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation.

Authors:  B T Volpe; H I Krebs; N Hogan; L Edelstein OTR; C Diels; M Aisen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  The impact of self-reported cumulative comorbidity on stroke recovery.

Authors:  Stephanie A Studenski; Sue Min Lai; Pamela W Duncan; Sally K Rigler
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 3.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Neville Hogan; Elizabeth M Perepezko; Hermano I Krebs; Jean M Rogers; Kanu S Goyal; Mark E Dohring; Eric Fredrickson; Joan Nethery; Robert L Ruff
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

5.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation.

Authors:  H I Krebs; B T Volpe; M L Aisen; N Hogan
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

6.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery.

Authors:  V M Parker; D T Wade; R Langton Hewer
Journal:  Int Rehabil Med       Date:  1986

7.  Multiple system utilization and mortality for veterans with stroke.

Authors:  Huanguang Jia; Yu Zheng; Dean M Reker; Diane C Cowper; Samuel S Wu; W Bruce Vogel; Gail C Young; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Does shorter rehabilitation limit potential recovery poststroke?

Authors:  Susan E Fasoli; Hermano I Krebs; Mark Ferraro; Neville Hogan; Bruce T Volpe
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  25 in total

1.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke.

Authors:  Fiona Coupar; Alex Pollock; Lynn A Legg; Catherine Sackley; Paulette van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

3.  An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Albert C Lo; Peter Peduzzi; Dawn M Bravata; Grant D Huang; Hermano I Krebs; Robert J Ringer; Daniel G Federman; Lorie G Richards; Jodie K Haselkorn; George F Wittenberg; Bruce T Volpe; Christopher T Bever; Pamela W Duncan; Andrew Siroka; Peter D Guarino
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Myoelectric Computer Interface Training for Reducing Co-Activation and Enhancing Arm Movement in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Emily M Mugler; Goran Tomic; Aparna Singh; Saad Hameed; Eric W Lindberg; Jon Gaide; Murad Alqadi; Elizabeth Robinson; Katherine Dalzotto; Camila Limoli; Tyler Jacobson; Jungwha Lee; Marc W Slutzky
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 6.  The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Guest editorial: emergent themes from second annual symposium on regenerative rehabilitation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Fabrisia Ambrosio; Michael L Boninger; Clifford E Brubaker; Anthony Delitto; William R Wagner; Richard K Shields; Steven L Wolf; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

8.  Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory.

Authors:  Michelle Woodbury; Craig A Velozo; Paul A Thompson; Kathye Light; Gitendra Uswatte; Edward Taub; Carolee J Winstein; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Robotics: A Rehabilitation Modality.

Authors:  Hermano Igo Krebs; Bruce T Volpe
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 10.  Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery.

Authors:  Bruce T Volpe; Patricio T Huerta; Johanna L Zipse; Avrielle Rykman; Dylan Edwards; Laura Dipietro; Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.