Literature DB >> 19541774

Comparison of maximum tolerated muscle torques produced by 2 pulse durations.

Wayne B Scott1, James B Causey, Tara L Marshall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an effective therapeutic technique for strengthening weak muscles. A positive dose-response relationship exists between the elicited muscle forces during training and strength (force-generating capacity) gains. Patient discomfort limits NMES muscle forces, potentially compromising efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the NMES muscle torques produced by stimulation trains consisting of 2 different pulse durations.
DESIGN: During a single testing session, the 2 pulse duration conditions (50 and 200 microseconds) were tested on the opposite lower extremities of the participants.
METHODS: The study participants were 10 adults without remarkable medical histories. The maximum tolerated isometric knee extensor torque was the primary dependent variable. The peak currents and phase charges that produced the maximally tolerated torques, as well as the sensory, motor, and pain thresholds for the 2 pulse conditions, were compared.
RESULTS: The 200-microsecond pulse duration condition resulted in participants tolerating significantly greater muscle torques; it was associated with significantly greater phase charges but significantly lower peak currents. LIMITATIONS: This study only compared muscle torques in response to stimulation trains consisting of pulses with short (50-microsecond) or medium (200-microsecond) durations and did not examine long ( approximately 400- to 600-microsecond) durations. Furthermore, the result of this study may not apply to NMES that uses stimulation patterns other than monophasic, square-wave pulsed current.
CONCLUSIONS: It has been suggested that short pulse durations are most appropriate for NMES because they are less likely to recruit nociceptors. The results of this study, however, support the use of a medium pulse duration rather than a short pulse duration when the goal is to produce a maximum torque response from a muscle. These observations may be related to the currents and phase charges for the pain thresholds for the 2 pulse duration conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19541774     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  3 in total

1.  Short vs. long pulses for testing knee extensor neuromuscular properties: does it matter?

Authors:  Caroline Giroux; Boris Roduit; Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Jacques Duchateau; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Comparison of the effects of kilohertz- and low-frequency electric stimulations: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hirotaka Iijima; Masaki Takahashi; Yuto Tashiro; Tomoki Aoyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation and Dysphagia Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-05-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.