Literature DB >> 19541255

Efficacy of LAIV-T on absentee rates in a school-based health center sample.

Cynthia J Mears1, Elisa N Lawler, Lee D Sanders, Ben Z Katz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of the intranasal LAIV-T in decreasing school absenteeism in a school-based vaccination initiative and to compare the acceptability of LAIV-T versus TIV among adolescents.
METHODS: This study was conducted within a single, urban community high school in the Fall of 2006. Participation was offered to all students in grades 6 to 10, aged 11 to 17 years. In December, school health center staff administered influenza vaccines to the students whose parents had returned written consent. Students received LAIV-T (n = 86), unless they were medically ineligible or objected; in those cases the injectable inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) (n = 41) was offered. Students that did not receive either vaccination served as a control group (n = 234). Nonsuspension absences between January and June of 2007 were tracked for all three groups.
RESULTS: Students who received the LAIV-T had significantly less nonsuspension absences (mean absences = 5.53, SD = 5.00) compared to both the TIV (mean absences = 9.45, SD = 9.07) and control groups (mean absences = 7.97, SD =7.59).
CONCLUSIONS: LAIV-T was associated with a reduction in nonsuspension absences and was well accepted by students. Administration of LAIV-T may be a convenient and effective method to mass-immunize students in a school setting and help establish herd immunity within the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19541255     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current experience with school-located influenza vaccination programs in the United States: a review of the medical literature.

Authors:  Harry F Hull; Christopher S Ambrose
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  Factors associated with increased vaccination in 2009 H1N1 school-located influenza vaccination programs.

Authors:  Christopher S Ambrose; Frangiscos Sifakis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-08-01

3.  [Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of the introduction of influenza vaccination for Italian children with Fluenz Tetra®].

Authors:  Sara Boccalini; Elena Pariani; Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Chiara DE Waure; Donatella Panatto; Daniela Amicizia; Piero Luigi Lai; Caterina Rizzo; Emanuele Amodio; Francesco Vitale; Alessandra Casuccio; Maria Luisa DI Pietro; Cristina Galli; Laura Bubba; Laura Pellegrinelli; Leonardo Villani; Floriana D'Ambrosio; Marta Caminiti; Elisa Lorenzini; Paola Fioretti; Rosanna Tindara Micale; Davide Frumento; Elisa Cantova; Flavio Parente; Giacomo Trento; Sara Sottile; Andrea Pugliese; Massimiliano Alberto Biamonte; Duccio Giorgetti; Marco Menicacci; Antonio D'Anna; Claudia Ammoscato; Emanuele LA Gatta; Angela Bechini; Paolo Bonanni
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2021-09-10

4.  Illness absenteeism rates in primary and secondary schools in 2013-2014 in England: was there any impact of vaccinating children of primary-school age against influenza?

Authors:  H K Green; N Brousseau; N Andrews; L Selby; R Pebody
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  An integrated, multistudy analysis of the safety of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine in children aged 2-17 years.

Authors:  Christopher S Ambrose; Tingting Yi; Judith Falloon
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Vaccination of children with a live-attenuated, intranasal influenza vaccine - analysis and evaluation through a Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Frank Andersohn; Reinhard Bornemann; Oliver Damm; Martin Frank; Thomas Mittendorf; Ulrike Theidel
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-10-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.