OBJECTIVE: Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) counts were determined in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) to elucidate their role in SCD-related ischemia-induced angiogenesis and reendothelialization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circulating EPC counts (KDR(+)/CD34(+)/Cd45(dim) cells) and their relation to serum levels of EPC mobilizing growth factors erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and interleukin-8 were investigated in SCD patients during asymptomatic state (n=66) and painful crisis (n=36) and compared to healthy controls (n=13). RESULTS: EPC counts were comparable between controls (0; range, 0-1.1 cells/mL) and patients (0; range, 0-0 cells/mL) in asymptomatic state, but were significantly higher during painful crisis (41.7; range, 0-186 cells/mL; p<0.05). Also in a paired analysis of 12 patients who were included both during asymptomatic state and painful crisis, EPC counts increased significantly during painful crisis (from 0 [range, 0-0] to 26 [range, 0-149 cell/mL; p<0.05). EPC counts were not related to any of the measured growth factors. CONCLUSION: The higher EPC counts during painful crisis might indicate a role for EPC mobilization in reendothelialization. As a relationship of EPCs with the established mobilizing growth factors, measured in this study was not observed, the mechanism of EPC mobilization in SCD remains to be elucidated.
OBJECTIVE: Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) counts were determined in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) to elucidate their role in SCD-related ischemia-induced angiogenesis and reendothelialization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circulating EPC counts (KDR(+)/CD34(+)/Cd45(dim) cells) and their relation to serum levels of EPC mobilizing growth factors erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and interleukin-8 were investigated in SCDpatients during asymptomatic state (n=66) and painful crisis (n=36) and compared to healthy controls (n=13). RESULTS: EPC counts were comparable between controls (0; range, 0-1.1 cells/mL) and patients (0; range, 0-0 cells/mL) in asymptomatic state, but were significantly higher during painful crisis (41.7; range, 0-186 cells/mL; p<0.05). Also in a paired analysis of 12 patients who were included both during asymptomatic state and painful crisis, EPC counts increased significantly during painful crisis (from 0 [range, 0-0] to 26 [range, 0-149 cell/mL; p<0.05). EPC counts were not related to any of the measured growth factors. CONCLUSION: The higher EPC counts during painful crisis might indicate a role for EPC mobilization in reendothelialization. As a relationship of EPCs with the established mobilizing growth factors, measured in this study was not observed, the mechanism of EPC mobilization in SCD remains to be elucidated.
Authors: Sergio Li Calzi; Matthew B Neu; Lynn C Shaw; Jennifer L Kielczewski; Nicanor I Moldovan; Maria B Grant Journal: Microvasc Res Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 3.514
Authors: Yunus Alapan; Arwa Fraiwan; Erdem Kucukal; M Noman Hasan; Ryan Ung; Myeongseop Kim; Isaac Odame; Jane A Little; Umut A Gurkan Journal: Expert Rev Med Devices Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 3.166
Authors: Solomon F Ofori-Acquah; Iris D Buchanan; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Jerry Manlove-Simmons; Feyisayo Lawal; Alexander Quarshie; Arshed A Quyyumi; Gary H Gibbons; Beatrice E Gee Journal: Anemia Date: 2012-05-23