Literature DB >> 19539104

Bioavailability and bioequivalence of two oral formulations of alendronate sodium 70 mg: an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Korean adult male volunteers.

Si-Youn Rhim1, Jin-Hee Park, Yoo-Sin Park, Min-Ho Lee, Dong-Sun Kim, Leslie M Shaw, Seok-Chul Yang, Ju-Seop Kang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alendronate sodium is a Bisphosphonate drug used to treat and prevent osteoporosis and several other bone diseases. A new formulation has been developed and is currently awaiting regulatory approval, pending findings on bioequivalence.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, and to determine the bioequivalence, of a test and reference formulation of alendronate sodium 70 mg in a healthy Korean adult male population.
METHODS: This open-label, randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study was carried out at Hanyang University Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Healthy Korean adult male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive a single 70-mg dose of the test or reference formulation of alendronate sodium, administered with 240 mL of water, followed by a 7-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. The study drugs were administered after a 12-hour overnight fast. Serial blood samples were collected and adverse events were monitored by a clinical investigator via observation, personal interview, and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature) over a 7-hour period (at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 hours) after drug administration. Plasma alendronate sodium concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic-postcolumn fluorescence derivatization method, with visible detection in the range of 2 to 100 ng/mL and lower limit of quantification set at 2 ng/mL. PK properties, including AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), C(max), T(max), t(1/2), and the elimination constant (k(e)), were determined using non-compartmental analysis. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CI ratios for C(max) and AUC were within the predetermined interval of 80% to 125%, the regulatory definition set by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
RESULTS: Twenty-three healthy male volunteers (mean [SD] age, 23.5 [2.0] years [range, 19-28 years]; height, 175.9 [5.4] cm [range, 162.0-185.0 cm]; and weight, 71.2 [9.5] kg [range, 61-96 kg]) were included in the study. No period or sequence effects were detected. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were 84.97 to 114.47, 86.09 to 115.59, and 82.37 to 110.71, respectively. Additionally, the mean (range) of T(max) was 1.09 hours (0.5-2.0 hours), and the mean (SD) of t(1/2) and k(e) were 2.04 (0.97) hours and 0.34 (0.71) hour, respectively. The values for the test and reference formulations were within the FDA bioequivalence definition interval of 80% to 125%. No adverse events were reported in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of these formulations of alendronate sodium 70 mg met the criteria for bio-equivalence. No statistically significant differences in AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and C(max) were found in this healthy Korean adult male population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19539104     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  6 in total

1.  Loss of bronchoprotection with ICS plus LABA treatment, β-receptor dynamics, and the effect of alendronate.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Cardet; Xiaofeng Jiang; Quan Lu; Norma Gerard; Kristen McIntire; Homer A Boushey; Mario Castro; Vernon M Chinchilli; Christopher D Codispoti; Anne-Marie Dyer; Fernando Holguin; Monica Kraft; Stephen Lazarus; Robert F Lemanske; Njira Lugogo; Dave Mauger; Wendy C Moore; James Moy; Victor E Ortega; Stephen P Peters; Lewis J Smith; Julian Solway; Christine A Sorkness; Kaharu Sumino; Michael E Wechsler; Sally Wenzel; Elliot Israel
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 2.  A critical review of brand and generic alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Kenneth S Davison; Wojciech P Olszynski; Karen A Beattie; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-21

3.  A highly sensitive prenylation assay reveals in vivo effects of bisphosphonate drug on the Rab prenylome of macrophages outside the skeleton.

Authors:  Naveid Ali; Julie Jurczyluk; Gemma Shay; Zakir Tnimov; Kirill Alexandrov; Marcia A Munoz; Oliver P Skinner; Nathan J Pavlos; Michael J Rogers
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2015-09-23

4.  Bioequivalence of generic alendronate sodium tablets (70 mg) to Fosamax® tablets (70 mg) in fasting, healthy volunteers: a randomized, open-label, three-way, reference-replicated crossover study.

Authors:  Yifan Zhang; Xiaoyan Chen; Yunbiao Tang; Youming Lu; Lixia Guo; Dafang Zhong
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Pharmacokinetics of coadministration of levothyroxine sodium and alendronate sodium new effervescent formulation.

Authors:  H G Bone; M A Walter; M E Hurley; S Epstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bioequivalence of Alendronate and Vitamin D3 in a Combination Tablet Versus Corresponding-Dose Individual Tablets in Healthy Taiwanese Volunteers, Determined Using a Novel Plasma Alendronate Assay.

Authors:  D Hamish Wright; Ramon Mols; Kevin R Brown; Geng-Chang Yeh; Eric Woolf; Lisa Hickey; Stefan Zajic
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2015-10-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.